-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
feat: add new Josephus file in Recursive directory #1728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
- Loading branch information
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
/** | ||
* @function Josephus | ||
* @description recursive implementation of the Josephus function. | ||
* @param {Integer[]} collection - The integer array. | ||
* @param {Integer} - The step size. | ||
* @return {Integer} - The last integer in the list. | ||
* @see [JosephusProblem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_problem) | ||
* @example [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] with step 3 = 4 | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
const josephus = (collection, step) => { | ||
// return null for invalid steps that are less than or equal to 0 | ||
if (step <= 0 || collection.length === 0) { | ||
return null | ||
} | ||
if (collection.length === 1) { | ||
return collection[0] | ||
} else { | ||
step = (step - 1) % collection.length | ||
collection.splice(step, 1) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is This algorithm also doesn't really benefit from recursion. It would be clearer as a simple while (collection.length > 1) { /* kill someone */ } return collection[0] |
||
return josephus(collection, step + collection.length) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
export { josephus } |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ | ||
import { josephus } from '../Josephus' | ||
|
||
describe('Josephus', () => { | ||
const collection = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] | ||
const collection1 = [1] | ||
const collection2 = [] | ||
|
||
it('should return 4 for step size of 3', () => { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Repetitive tests of the form "should return X for Y" should use |
||
const step = 3 | ||
expect(josephus([...collection], step)).toBe(4) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
it('should return 4 for a step size of 10', () => { | ||
const step = 10 | ||
expect(josephus([...collection], step)).toBe(4) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
it('should return null for a step size of 0 as it is invalid', () => { | ||
const step = 0 | ||
expect(josephus([...collection], step)).toBeNull() | ||
}) | ||
|
||
it('should return 7 for a step size of 1000', () => { | ||
const step = 1000 | ||
expect(josephus([...collection], step)).toBe(7) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
it('should return null for a step size of -1 as it is invalid', () => { | ||
const step = -1 | ||
expect(josephus([...collection], step)).toBeNull() | ||
}) | ||
it('should return 1 for a collection with just 1', () => { | ||
const step = 2 | ||
expect(josephus([...collection1], step)).toBe(1) | ||
}) | ||
it('should return null for an empty collection as it is invalid', () => { | ||
const step = 3 | ||
expect(josephus([...collection2], step)).toBeNull() | ||
}) | ||
}) |