Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Security: GeiserX/Website-Diff

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

Supported Versions

Version Supported
1.0.x
< 1.0

Security Audit Report (2025年12月13日)

Security Measures Implemented

1. URL Validation and SSRF Protection

  • Location: website_diff/fetcher.py
  • Implementation:
    • URL scheme validation (only http/https allowed)
    • Basic SSRF protection with localhost/internal network detection
    • URL parsing using urllib.parse.urlparse for safe parsing
  • Status: ✅ Implemented
  • Note: Localhost access is allowed for development/testing purposes

2. Input Sanitization

  • Location: website_diff/cli.py, website_diff/link_traverser.py
  • Implementation:
    • URL normalization and validation
    • Filtering of dangerous protocols (javascript:, mailto:, tel:, etc.)
    • Email address detection and filtering
  • Status: ✅ Implemented

3. File Path Security

  • Location: All file operations
  • Implementation:
    • Uses pathlib.Path for safe path handling
    • Paths are relative to user-specified directories
    • No direct user input used in file paths without validation
  • Status: ✅ Safe
  • Note: All file operations use Path objects which prevent path traversal

4. No Command Injection

  • Status: ✅ Verified
  • Findings: No use of eval(), exec(), subprocess with shell=True, or os.system()

5. No Hardcoded Secrets

  • Status: ✅ Verified
  • Findings:
    • No passwords, API keys, or tokens in code
    • Secrets only referenced via environment variables in GitHub Actions
    • Docker credentials stored as GitHub secrets

6. Safe File Operations

  • Status: ✅ Verified
  • Findings:
    • All file writes use explicit encoding ('utf-8')
    • Binary file operations use 'wb' mode appropriately
    • No unsafe file permissions set

Security Recommendations

  1. SSRF Protection Enhancement (Medium Priority)

    • Consider implementing a more robust SSRF protection mechanism
    • Add option to disable localhost access in production environments
    • Implement IP address whitelist/blacklist functionality
  2. Rate Limiting (Low Priority)

    • Consider adding rate limiting for web requests to prevent abuse
    • Implement request throttling for link traversal
  3. Content Size Limits (Low Priority)

    • Add maximum content size limits to prevent memory exhaustion
    • Implement streaming for very large files

Reporting a Vulnerability

If you discover a security vulnerability, please report it via:

Please include:

  • Description of the vulnerability
  • Steps to reproduce
  • Potential impact
  • Suggested fix (if available)

Security Best Practices for Users

  1. Secrets Management

    • Never commit secrets to the repository
    • Use environment variables or secret management tools
    • Rotate credentials regularly
  2. Network Security

    • Be cautious when comparing URLs from untrusted sources
    • Use the tool in isolated environments when testing unknown websites
    • Monitor network traffic when using the tool
  3. File System Security

    • Use dedicated directories for reports and screenshots
    • Review generated files before sharing
    • Clean up generated artifacts regularly

Security Checklist

  • No hardcoded secrets
  • URL validation implemented
  • SSRF protection (basic)
  • Path traversal protection (via Path objects)
  • No command injection vectors
  • Safe file operations
  • Input sanitization
  • Proper error handling
  • No unsafe deserialization
  • Dependencies up to date

There aren’t any published security advisories

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /