Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Keep up with upstream #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
auxten merged 71 commits into CovenantSQL:keep-up from mattn:master
Feb 18, 2019
Merged

Keep up with upstream #2

auxten merged 71 commits into CovenantSQL:keep-up from mattn:master
Feb 18, 2019

Conversation

Copy link

@auxten auxten commented Nov 21, 2018

No description provided.

jung-kurt and others added 30 commits August 12, 2018 08:34
This change could save users from having to dig into source code to see how connection options are parsed.
with comments what const are used for what
implementation of set_authorizer interface
CryptEncoder SHA384 and SHA512 variants (with and without salt) were incorrectly documented as using SHA256.
Mention correct algorithm in function docs.
Actually check the value of RunTests
Add Go 1.11 to Travis build matrix
Remove extra backtick and fix Markdown formatting
Update README: URL-encode connection options
mattn and others added 24 commits November 22, 2018 01:46
Distinguish between NULL and zero-length blobs on query
Close db even if sqlite3_open_v2 return non-zero.
SQLITE_OPEN_CREATE should be specified for sqlite3_open_v2 if mode is...
As opposed to []byte arrays. This brings sqlite closer
in line with other dbs like postgres, allowing downstream
consumers to assume the scanned value is string across underlying
dbs.
Copy link

@auxten I see these issues

# github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3
sqlite3-binding.c:222430:42: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2
sqlite3-binding.c:66273:1: note: 'sqlite3BtreeBeginTrans' declared here
sqlite3-binding.c:24:25: note: expanded from macro 'SQLITE_PRIVATE'
sqlite3-binding.c:222431:43: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2
sqlite3-binding.c:66273:1: note: 'sqlite3BtreeBeginTrans' declared here
sqlite3-binding.c:24:25: note: expanded from macro 'SQLITE_PRIVATE'
sqlite3-binding.c:223249:46: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2
sqlite3-binding.c:66273:1: note: 'sqlite3BtreeBeginTrans' declared here
sqlite3-binding.c:24:25: note: expanded from macro 'SQLITE_PRIVATE'

on fresh update from mattn.

Do you plan on updating the fork soon? Thanks.

Btw, develop works fantastic 😄

@auxten auxten changed the base branch from develop to keep-up February 18, 2019 07:34
@auxten auxten merged commit 8e25596 into CovenantSQL:keep-up Feb 18, 2019
Copy link
Author

auxten commented Feb 18, 2019
edited
Loading

@auxten I see these issues

# github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3
sqlite3-binding.c:222430:42: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2
sqlite3-binding.c:66273:1: note: 'sqlite3BtreeBeginTrans' declared here
sqlite3-binding.c:24:25: note: expanded from macro 'SQLITE_PRIVATE'
sqlite3-binding.c:222431:43: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2
sqlite3-binding.c:66273:1: note: 'sqlite3BtreeBeginTrans' declared here
sqlite3-binding.c:24:25: note: expanded from macro 'SQLITE_PRIVATE'
sqlite3-binding.c:223249:46: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 3, have 2
sqlite3-binding.c:66273:1: note: 'sqlite3BtreeBeginTrans' declared here
sqlite3-binding.c:24:25: note: expanded from macro 'SQLITE_PRIVATE'

on fresh update from mattn.

Do you plan on updating the fork soon? Thanks.

Btw, develop works fantastic 😄

hey, thanks for using it 😄
We are busy working on CovenantSQL now. For compatibility, we did not keep up with upstream. I merged @mattn 's upstream to branch keep-up, but have NOT done enough test. you can try it out. For any issue, glad to help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@xq262144 xq262144 Awaiting requested review from xq262144

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /