Fwd: gcj can not import packages
Bill Chatfield via java
java@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Jan 16 22:58:00 GMT 2017
>From the link, it looks like it would be correct to say that gcj is the *only* open source way to bootstrap OpenJDK.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ricardo Wurmus [mailto:rekado@elephly.net]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 3:10 PM
To: Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com>
Cc: 'Andrew Haley' <aph@redhat.com>; 'mohan NMH' <mohan.nmh2@gmail.com>; java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: gcj can not import packages
Bill Chatfield via java <java@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> I understand that OpenJDK is available as open source now, to
> "replace" gcj. But, gcj still has certain advantages that OpenJDK does
> not have:
>> 1. gcj can compile to a native executable. […]
>> 2 gij is more memory efficient than OpenJDK at runtime. […]
>> 3. OpenJDK only supports a few platforms. […]
I would like to add one point: GCJ can be used to cleanly bootstrap the OpenJDK from source with a chain that starts with GCC’s C compiler, to GCJ, to OpenJDK 6 (via IcedTea).
(The only wart is that later versions of GCJ rely on a pre-built jar of
ecj.)
This is why the bootstrappable builds project lists “Maintaining the GNU Compiler for Java” as a collaboration project.[1]
[1]: http://bootstrappable.org/projects.html
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net
More information about the Java
mailing list