Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine
Marcin Dalecki
martin@dalecki.de
Wed Jan 31 13:15:00 GMT 2007
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2007年01月31日, o godz12:50, przez Andrew Haley:
> Benjamin Kosnik writes:
>>>> I am somewhat concerned with the response of the java maintainers
>> (and others) that it's OK to require >512MB to bootstrap gcc with
>> java, or that make times "WORKSFORME."
>> Well, I didn't say that, so I hope you aren't referring to me. But
> before we do anything we need to know more about the machine on which
> it failed.
>> Ultimately, it's a question of what we consider to be a reasonable
> machine on which to build libgcj. I don't know the answer to that.
512MB is *certainly* resonable. It's the most common amount of
shipping RAM
for in esp. notebooks and it's what usually get's allocated to
virtualization
solutions.
More information about the Java
mailing list