Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine

Wed Jan 31 11:51:00 GMT 2007

Benjamin Kosnik writes:
 > 
 > I am somewhat concerned with the response of the java maintainers
 > (and others) that it's OK to require >512MB to bootstrap gcc with
 > java, or that make times "WORKSFORME."
Well, I didn't say that, so I hope you aren't referring to me. But
before we do anything we need to know more about the machine on which
it failed.
Ultimately, it's a question of what we consider to be a reasonable
machine on which to build libgcj. I don't know the answer to that.
Andrew.