Paul Gear wrote: >More questions along the same topic: has _Jv_AllocBytes been deprecated >or something? It appears in the doco at >http://gcc.gnu.org/java/papers/cni/t1308.html >and >http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcj/Object-allocation.html#Object%20allocation >but when i try to use it it is not defined. >>Yeah, it looks like this function is documented but not actually declared in cni.h which is odd. This patch adds the appropriate declaration (which is JvAllocBytes, not _Jv_AllocBytes), and improves the documentation a bit. I'll be checking it in shortly. >(I'm also not sure which one of the above doco links i should be working >from. I'm using gcc 3.3.1 on Red Hat Linux 9.) >>Also, assuming _Jv_AllocBytes() is still the right thing to use, does it >return zeroed memory? >>Yes. Regards Bryce -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cni-jvallocbytes.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2762 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20040525/f7234239/attachment.bin>