Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>"Paul" == Paul Gear <paul@gear.dyndns.org> writes: >>>>>http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcj/Mixing-with-C--.html >>> Paul> One more question: I notice in the examples that the field is defined in > Paul> the C++ source instead of the Java source. Is this the recommended best > Paul> practice, or is it simply up to personal preference? My natural > Paul> inclination is to put as much as possible in the Java source and write > Paul> only the parts actually required in C++. >> The normal practice is to declare all fields in Java, compile to > .class, and then in turn generate a C++ header file for your class > using gcjh. This will generate the C++ class declaration for you, > including field declarations. Yup - got that part already. I just wanted to make sure i wasn't missing something in the way fields were declared. More questions along the same topic: has _Jv_AllocBytes been deprecated or something? It appears in the doco at http://gcc.gnu.org/java/papers/cni/t1308.html and http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcj/Object-allocation.html#Object%20allocation but when i try to use it it is not defined. (I'm also not sure which one of the above doco links i should be working from. I'm using gcc 3.3.1 on Red Hat Linux 9.) Also, assuming _Jv_AllocBytes() is still the right thing to use, does it return zeroed memory? Thanks again, Paul http://paulgear.webhop.net -- Think context! Using accepted quoting conventions makes your email easier to understand. Learn how at <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20040525/4a400505/attachment.sig>