cross-module inlining (was Re: using gcj for a different language - is it possible?)

Tue Feb 10 16:59:00 GMT 2004

Cool. BTW, Andrew, are you sort of the indirect-dispatch guru now
that Bryce is gone? He vanished shortly before I posted this, and I'd
still love to hear an answer:
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-11/msg00157.html
 - a
Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
> Adam Megacz writes:
> > 
> > Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
> > > Sounds like the preferred policy will be indirect dispatch (binary
> > 
> > Forgive me if I've missed some stuff (I believe I've read all the
> > back-messages), but the last time I was reading this list every day
> > (about 9 months ago), indirect dispatch wasn't working quite right and
> > Bryce had disappeared... has anything changed?
>> Yes.
>> We're moving towards binary compatibility (as defined in Chapter 13)
> as the default for gcj, slowly moving towards full language standard
> compatibility. Indirect dispatch still isn't working quite right,
> although it's more complete than it was. I have another patch for
> this area that I'm working on at the moment.
>> Andrew.
>
-- 
 "Keep your thoughts positive because your thoughts become your words.
 Keep your words positive because your words become your behaviors.
 Keep your behaviors positive because your behaviors become your habits.
 Keep your habits positive because your habits become your values.
 Keep your values positive because your values become your destiny."
 - Gandhi Ji