cross-module inlining (was Re: using gcj for a different language - is it possible?)

Tue Feb 10 11:07:00 GMT 2004

Adam Megacz writes:
 > 
 > Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
 > > Sounds like the preferred policy will be indirect dispatch (binary
 > 
 > Forgive me if I've missed some stuff (I believe I've read all the
 > back-messages), but the last time I was reading this list every day
 > (about 9 months ago), indirect dispatch wasn't working quite right and
 > Bryce had disappeared... has anything changed?
Yes.
We're moving towards binary compatibility (as defined in Chapter 13)
as the default for gcj, slowly moving towards full language standard
compatibility. Indirect dispatch still isn't working quite right,
although it's more complete than it was. I have another patch for
this area that I'm working on at the moment.
Andrew.