gcj win32 frustration

Wed Aug 4 00:38:00 GMT 2004

Just for the record, I have compiled gdb 6.2 on win32, and it returns
the same unhelpful backtraces. But the app runs fine under gdb (when
'conitinuing' or not stopping on SIGTRAPS), but NPEs due to the
ACCESS_VIOLATION when not under gdb (this still doesn't make sense to
me).
GNU gdb 6.2
warning: HEAP[sancho.exe]:
warning: Invalid Address specified to RtlFreeHeap( 00250000, 0022E100 )
Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
0x77f767ce in ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg () from ntdll.dll
(gdb) bt
#0 0x77f767ce in ntdll!DbgUiConnectToDbg () from ntdll.dll
#1 0x77fa2612 in ntdll!RtlpNtMakeTemporaryKey () from ntdll.dll
#2 0x77f881c0 in ntdll!RtlCheckRegistryKey () from ntdll.dll
#3 0x00250000 in ?? ()
#4 0x0022e100 in ?? ()
#5 0x0022df3c in ?? ()
#6 0x77fa2f17 in ntdll!RtlpNtMakeTemporaryKey () from ntdll.dll
#7 0x00250000 in ?? ()
#8 0x0022e0f8 in ?? ()
#9 0x77fb1bd4 in wcstombs () from ntdll.dll
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
I have also made a simple class (that still needs SWT) which puts the
Browser widget in a StackLayout which produces the NPE. Anyone else
using gcj on win32 that might know what is going on?
Regards,
Rutger Ovidius
Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 7:35:53 AM, you wrote:
RO> I use the gdb snapshot from mingw.org. Maybe they aren't very up to
RO> date with gdb builds. I'll try to build cvs sometime but I don't know
RO> how smooth the build is on win32.