gcj, gij; dynamic compile problem?

Wed Jun 25 21:39:00 GMT 2003

Seems to be a problem with RH 7.3. The code worked fine on RH 9.
Don't know what is wrong with 7.3. I suspect libdl and ld. It could 
be the 2.4.19 kernel but that seems unlikely. I suspect that Steve W. is 
2.4.18, and RH 9 is 2.4.20.
Thanks
Steve Pribyl wrote:
> Steve et all,
>> The "new" that is used is from the boehm gc. I am inclined to think to 
> agree with Tom that it is not glibc but in libdl or the ld.
> I ran the same test using the same gcc build(built on RH7.3) on RH 9 box 
> and it worked better. Actually ran the code but died in _fini unloading 
> libgcj, again possibly pointing to a libdl, ld problem.
>> I am rebuilding gcc on RH 9 to try the test again. r
>>> weppnesp@eckerd.edu wrote:
>>> Steve, How old is your glibc? I have 2.2.5, perhaps an update is 
>> needed to 2.3 for gcj
>> and gij such that only the static switch works. Anybody else know 
>> about how many
>> of the newer features of glibc are used in gcj?
>>>> Cheers,
>> Steve Weppner
>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> This mail sent via Eckerd IMP: http://webmail.eckerd.edu
>>>>
-- 
Steve Pribyl
Steve AT NetFuel dot com
Computer Infrastructure Practitioner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4024 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20030625/92161374/attachment.bin>