gcj, gij; dynamic compile problem?

Wed Jun 25 16:47:00 GMT 2003

Steve et all,
The "new" that is used is from the boehm gc. I am inclined to think to 
agree with Tom that it is not glibc but in libdl or the ld.
I ran the same test using the same gcc build(built on RH7.3) on RH 9 box 
and it worked better. Actually ran the code but died in _fini unloading 
libgcj, again possibly pointing to a libdl, ld problem.
I am rebuilding gcc on RH 9 to try the test again. r
weppnesp@eckerd.edu wrote:
> Steve, 
> How old is your glibc? I have 2.2.5, perhaps an update is needed to 2.3 for gcj
> and gij such that only the static switch works. Anybody else know about how many
> of the newer features of glibc are used in gcj?
>> Cheers,
> Steve Weppner
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent via Eckerd IMP: http://webmail.eckerd.edu
>
-- 
Steve Pribyl
Steve AT NetFuel dot com
Computer Infrastructure Practitioner