Problems with Mohans GCJ 20030522 build
Mohan Embar
gnustuff@thisiscool.com
Wed Jun 4 07:01:00 GMT 2003
Hi People,
>> I have discussed this with Mohan, but we haven't figured out
>> why GCJ as of >20030409 must have thisiscool-gcc\gcc-3.3\bin
>> in the path.
>>Probably because these have the "mingw-local" patches
>applied...
I thought that Ãyvind had this problem with my build prior to the
last one, which didn't have the mingw-local patches. Ãyvind?
>> - If I fix the path, it dies with:
>>>> [apply] com/cyviz/xyzmodem/Upload.java:164: warning: unreachable
>> bytecode from 221 to before 224
>> [apply] Error: 0-bit reloc in dll
>> [apply] Error: 0-bit reloc in dll
>>The latter seems to be a bug in recent MinGW binutils
>on large objects/DLLs:
Should I put out a new release with a prior version of binutils? Or
the new release candidate? Should I just stop combining binutils
and gcc like Andrew suggested (and like I have been tempted to
do on more than one occasion)?
Does this binutils bug have anything to do with my segfault when
trying to build libgcj.dll? If so, will I perhaps fare better with the
release candidate?
-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/
More information about the Java
mailing list