What's up with jc1 segfaulting on mingw target? [PR 5876]

Adam Megacz gcj@lists.megacz.com
Thu Mar 7 14:30:00 GMT 2002


Guys, this is getting worse.
As of yesterday, gcj segfaults even with Jeff's patch (even after
Jan's fixes from this morning). See my last post for the specific
failure.
I hate to sound whiney like this, but is anybody ever going to look
into why gcj segfaults when compiling code for a mingw target? I
simply don't have the time or skill to get involved in front-end
work. If nobody else is interested in fixing it, please let me know
before I waste any more time on porting libgcj.
 - a
Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
> On 5 Mar 2002, Adam Megacz wrote:
> > Basically, I'd love to see mingw-gcj in 3.1, but it's sorta stupid for
> > me to stress over it if the front end is going to remain broken.

> I'm of the opinion this should be a high-priority PR. It's a regression
> over 3.0, after all.

> If nothing else, what do others think about backing out the offending
> patch on 3.1 only?

-- 
"If I put copyrighted material into the 'chewy nougat center', I can
 claim the crunchy chocolate coating is an 'Access Control
 Mechanism'." --lynx_user_abroad
Why Windows NT/2k/XP is unreliable: www.zappadoodle.com


More information about the Java mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /