[3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's?
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Mon Apr 22 15:56:00 GMT 2002
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
>> In the 3.0 and 3.1 branch, libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 is used. Is this
>> intended, or should the soname changed for the 3.1 release? If not,
>> can the libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 from 3.1 used as a replacement for 3.0's
>> libgcjgc?
Jeff> Actually I don't think libgcjgc.so is used anymore, and needn't
Jeff> be installed, right?
I was just going to say the same thing. I think the same applies to
zlib as well. We can just use noinst_ and then we don't need to worry
about the soname.
Tom
More information about the Java
mailing list