[3.1 branch] libgcjgc's soname conflicts with gcc-3.0's?
Jeff Sturm
jsturm@one-point.com
Mon Apr 22 13:55:00 GMT 2002
On 2002年4月22日, Matthias Klose wrote:
> In the 3.0 and 3.1 branch, libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 is used. Is this
> intended, or should the soname changed for the 3.1 release? If not,
> can the libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 from 3.1 used as a replacement for 3.0's
> libgcjgc?
Actually I don't think libgcjgc.so is used anymore, and needn't be
installed, right? I'll post a patch.
Jeff
More information about the Java
mailing list