javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
Nic Ferrier
nferrier@tf1.tapsellferrier.co.uk
Tue Oct 23 12:50:00 GMT 2001
>Is it really easier to split the resources? I really have to think
>about this. It does not feel like such a great idea to split the few
>people that we have working on this stuff between different projects,
>CVS trees and mailinglists. Especially since they are all GNU
>projects.
It's good to split ClasspathX and Classpath.
The ClasspathX project has quite a few people who
are not involved elsewhere with GNU java (or GNU at all).
It's also good because the regimes are different, ClasspathX accepts
code without requiring (c) assignment, Classpath does not (because
Classpath is more important to GNU than ClasspathX is).
As for splits elsewhere, I don't know. It seems to me that the
gcj/classpath split is useful.
Nic
More information about the Java
mailing list