awt conclusion?

Niklas Fondberg niklas.fondberg@i3micro.com
Sat Oct 20 14:25:00 GMT 2001

• Previous message (by thread): javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
• Next message (by thread): awt conclusion?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Is anybody working on it?
Is there a schedule?
I believe libgcj/gcj is missing a major feature in the lack of awt support.
The kaffe implementation with using X for the *nix platform seem like
a good decision (in my opinion).
I've seen qt/x/gtk cluttered awt-start implementations and has not been lucky, correct me if I'm wrong.
-------------------------------------------------
Niklas Fondberg niklas.fondberg@i3micro.org
System Developer I3 Micro Technology

---

• Previous message (by thread): javax.naming work (Classpath vs ClasspathX)
• Next message (by thread): awt conclusion?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Java mailing list