[Fwd: [Fwd: Problems compiling libgcj-snapshot-2000年10月29日]]

Thu Nov 2 12:23:00 GMT 2000

The matter is, that a jc1 compiled by a current gcc wont
compile libgcj. But a jc1 compiled by 2.95.2 will.
mfg
Tom.Williams@diversifiedsoftware.com schrieb:
>> Are you saying that I basically need gcc-2.95.2 compiled version of the
> current egcs-20001030 snapshot jc1? I guess making egcs-2001030 WITHOUT
> the bootstrap will not go through the motions of letting the experimental
> compiler build the experimental compiler (i.e. stage1/stage2 processing)?
>> I'll give it a try and see what happens.
>> Thanks!
>> Peace....
>> Tom
>> Frank Endriss <Frank.Endriss@bancos.com>@sources.redhat.com on 11/02/2000
> 07:03:08 AM
>> Sent by: java-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
>> To: java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> cc:
> Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Problems compiling libgcj-snapshot-2000年10月29日]]
>> Gotcha, I made it run !
> Thats the way it worked for me:
>> Compile and install 2.95.2 (make bootstrap)
> Compile and install a current version (make bootstrap)
> Set your PATH in a way that 2.95.2 is used.
> Compile the current version without bootstrap, just compile
> via make. This will crash. But: somewhere in your build
> dir you will find the executable jc1.
> Copy this jc1 to the location where your previous
> installed the current version (there is a jc1, too, over-
> write it).
>> Magic: This version of gcc will build libgcj.
>> mfg Frank Endriss
>> Tom.Williams@diversifiedsoftware.com schrieb:
> >
> > Hi! I'm still getting this problem with gcj-20001030 built with
> gcc-2.95.2
> > and libgcj-snapshot-2000年10月30日.
> >
> > Peace......
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > Frank Endriss <Frank.Endriss@bancos.com>@sources.redhat.com on 11/01/2000
> > 09:02:07 AM
> >
> > Sent by: java-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
> >
> > To: java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> > cc:
> > Subject: [Fwd: Problems compiling libgcj-snapshot-2000年10月29日]
> >
> > Alexandre Petit-Bianco schrieb:
> > >
> > > Tom.Williams@diversifiedsoftware.com writes:
> > >
> > > > I used egcs-20001016 (I think) to build egcs-20001023. Do you think
> > > > I have a bad gcj?
> > >
> > > This is similar to what I encountered yesterday. Make sure you `which
> > > gcc` doesn't grab something you installed recently but rather use the
> > > default compiler. Rebuild jc1, install and then build libgcj.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > it would be nice if you tell which version of gcc/gcj do you
> > think of as "default compiler".
> > I checked that it is not 2.92.2, since this version wont compile
> > the current libgcj.
> >
> > thanks,
> > mfg Frank Endriss