[Fwd: [Fwd: Problems compiling libgcj-snapshot-2000年10月29日]]

Thu Nov 2 10:03:00 GMT 2000

Are you saying that I basically need gcc-2.95.2 compiled version of the
current egcs-20001030 snapshot jc1? I guess making egcs-2001030 WITHOUT
the bootstrap will not go through the motions of letting the experimental
compiler build the experimental compiler (i.e. stage1/stage2 processing)?
I'll give it a try and see what happens.
Thanks!
Peace....
Tom
Frank Endriss <Frank.Endriss@bancos.com>@sources.redhat.com on 11/02/2000
07:03:08 AM
Sent by: java-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
To: java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Problems compiling libgcj-snapshot-2000年10月29日]]
Gotcha, I made it run !
Thats the way it worked for me:
Compile and install 2.95.2 (make bootstrap)
Compile and install a current version (make bootstrap)
Set your PATH in a way that 2.95.2 is used.
Compile the current version without bootstrap, just compile
via make. This will crash. But: somewhere in your build
dir you will find the executable jc1.
Copy this jc1 to the location where your previous
installed the current version (there is a jc1, too, over-
write it).
Magic: This version of gcc will build libgcj.
mfg Frank Endriss
Tom.Williams@diversifiedsoftware.com schrieb:
>> Hi! I'm still getting this problem with gcj-20001030 built with
gcc-2.95.2
> and libgcj-snapshot-2000年10月30日.
>> Peace......
>> Tom
>> Frank Endriss <Frank.Endriss@bancos.com>@sources.redhat.com on 11/01/2000
> 09:02:07 AM
>> Sent by: java-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
>> To: java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> cc:
> Subject: [Fwd: Problems compiling libgcj-snapshot-2000年10月29日]
>> Alexandre Petit-Bianco schrieb:
> >
> > Tom.Williams@diversifiedsoftware.com writes:
> >
> > > I used egcs-20001016 (I think) to build egcs-20001023. Do you think
> > > I have a bad gcj?
> >
> > This is similar to what I encountered yesterday. Make sure you `which
> > gcc` doesn't grab something you installed recently but rather use the
> > default compiler. Rebuild jc1, install and then build libgcj.
>> Hello,
>> it would be nice if you tell which version of gcc/gcj do you
> think of as "default compiler".
> I checked that it is not 2.92.2, since this version wont compile
> the current libgcj.
>> thanks,
> mfg Frank Endriss