Stable release?
Matt Welsh
mdw@cs.berkeley.edu
Sat Apr 1 00:00:00 GMT 2000
Andrew Haley <aph@pasanda.cygnus.co.uk> writes:
> I think you're looking at this way too optimistically!
>> We would inevitably start having to collect patches to any "blessed"
> version of gcc,
No you don't! Only accept patches against the latest CVS tree. The
point of having a "blessed" gcc is so that people can start using the
latest libgcj, which is where the action is anyway.
More information about the Java
mailing list