Stable release?

Sat Apr 1 00:00:00 GMT 2000

> From: Matt Welsh <mdw@cs.berkeley.edu>
> Date: 2000年2月16日 10:22:04 -0800
>>> I guess I don't understand the problem here. Isn't the Java-specific
> portion of EGCS maintained by people *on this list*? What, then, is
> the problem with making branded versions of EGCS/LIBGCJ available to
> people on the GCJ website?

If it were just the Java specific parts, there wouldn't be any
problem. However, gcc is not just a Java compiler, so any blessed
compiler would need to be fully functional for all its front ends to
be useful.
> Also keep in mind that almost all of the bugs we're likely to run
> into are in libgcj, NOT EGCS!

That is not my experience.
Andrew.