Wikipedia talk:Speedy keep
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 26 days ago by FaviFake in topic Discussion at WP:VPPR § Should we disallow opening parallel RM and AfD discussions?
Media mention
This guideline has been mentioned by a media organization:
- Alexandra Thom (16 July 2013). "Writing Women Back Into History". Brooklyn Museum. Archived from the original on 28 July 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
Archives
This page has archives.Topics inactive for 28 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3.
Oh, look, we did it again, again Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Fulnecky essay controversy
[edit ]I'm just going to keep posting these as I see them unless someone wants to propose a sub-page to catalogue the week-of deletion nominations. Jclemens (talk) 07:10, 5 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
- No reason not to delete these things until they pan out and prove to be more than the outrage of the week. Mangoe (talk) 12:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
@Extraordinary Writ I made a different pass from you to make this guideline properly recognize merge discussions at AfD. Pinging you for any comment. —Alalch E. 18:05, 6 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I don't really think the RfC was designed to make merging categorically different from redirecting or draftifying or any of the other ATDs (none of which are spelled out separately), but maybe that's more of an issue with the new language at WP:AFD than with the changes you just made. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I see it like this: The RfC did not change what merging is; it only changed one part of the "how" (the part when it is done by consensus in a formal process), not the "what". —Alalch E. 18:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
You are invited to join the discussion at WP:VPPR § Should we disallow opening parallel RM and AfD discussions?. FaviFake (talk) 10:57, 7 July 2026 (UTC) FaviFake (talk) 10:57, 7 July 2026 (UTC) Reply