Wikipedia talk:Contact us
This page is for discussion of the Contact us page itself.
- Please go back to the Contact Us page to read how to contact Wikipedia.
- To ask questions about Wikipedia, see the Questions page .
- To get help with reference questions, see the Reference desk .
- Add new text under old text.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Archives
This page has archives.Topics inactive for 60 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.
Adding a link to the WMF Legal and Safety Contact page
Per the recent WMF notice and its FAQ, this page should include a link to wmf:Legal:Wikimedia Foundation Legal and Safety Contact Information. Any thoughts on how best to integrate it? jlwoodwa (talk) 23:25, 25 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
- There's now a Legal and Safety contact link at the very bottom of every WP page, below the CCA-SA notice. FactOrOpinion (talk) 17:56, 26 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
- The FAQ requests that
If wikis have existing "Contact" pages and links, the community will update these to prevent confusion.
I agree with this – someone reading this page could reasonably expect to find the relevant WMF contact link within the page's content. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:09, 27 December 2025 (UTC) Reply- Agree an addition should be made here. You're an admin; you're welcome to add one. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
- @Pppery, @Jlwoodwa thank you for helping with this. Happy holidays. - STei (WMF) (talk) 12:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Hi all - just following up on this. @Jlwoodwa, is it something you wanted to do? PBradley-WMF (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @Pppery, @Jlwoodwa thank you for helping with this. Happy holidays. - STei (WMF) (talk) 12:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Agree an addition should be made here. You're an admin; you're welcome to add one. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
- The FAQ requests that
Edit request 6 April 2026
|answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.Please change the image in Wikipedia:Contact us/Article subjects to File:Wiki talk tab Vector 2022.png, because it is highly likely that one will be using the Vector 2022 skin instead of Vector 2010 if they are an article subject, because it is the default skin, and you cannot change it unless you log in. Few article subjects have Wikipedia accounts, and even fewer use a skin other than Vector 2022.
Diff:
ozmoozmo @enwiki (talk:contribs) 23:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
Let "Autobiographies" be accepted sources!
Hey!
I would like to make a proposal to make "autobiographies" accepted sources!
It is one of the most fundamental and basic sources one can find, namely the people involved's own experiences and their own knowledge about themselves and their lives. Empirical research could be something similar.
It is a unique opportunity to be able to take part in a type of first-hand knowledge, as with own experience, and empirical research.
There are plenty of examples of autobiographies in literature, and which can also be used as source material.
People like Winston Churchill, Adolf Hitler, and many more can be mentioned.
With regards
Martin Vikene RobynMartinX (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
Let "Wikipedia" be A.I. controlled!
I propose that Wikipedia should be A.I. controlled, so that the system becomes more fair.
This is especially to prevent individuals from being able to sabotage and delete content from other individuals that they may not like, based on their own preferences and opinions. The Wikipedia system should be more neutral and objective. It is difficult to achieve this with individual individuals' own assessments, which may be based on their own selfish opinions and perceptions.
An A.I. controlled Wikipedia would be more fair and neutral!
How to achieve this? By making Wikipedia automated according to certain standardized criteria. It is enough with 3 - 4 criteria, such as neutral/objective format, source references, plausibility, and coherence, perhaps with more. This should be able to be checked and controlled by A.I. .
Should there be disputes about content, it can be taken to special neutral committees, possibly like the legal system in general society. RobynMartinX (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
Is there a way to change my Wikipedia username page here? Without losing the initial established page? Univertalemail (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Reply