Wikipedia:WikiProject Maryland/Baltimore task force
|Semi-active
parameter from this template if activity resumes or if this tag was changed in error. If almost no activity occurs in this task force, consider replacing this tag with {{WikiProject status|Inactive}}
.
Introduction[edit ]Welcome to WikiProject Maryland's Baltimore task force! This is a place to collaborate on Baltimore-related articles. Look below for specific tasks related to editing Baltimore articles. Tasks[edit ]
Scope[edit ]The scope of this work group will be all articles in the Category:Baltimore and its subcategories. Members[edit ]
Member userboxes[edit ]You may place one of the following Baltimore task force userboxes on your user&page: |
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Maryland/Baltimore task force/Userbox|city|flag}} | ||||||||||||||||||
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Maryland/Baltimore task force/Userbox|city|seal}} | |||||||||||||||||||
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Maryland/Baltimore task force/Userbox|county|flag}} | |||||||||||||||||||
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Maryland/Baltimore task force/Userbox|county|seal}} |
Any of these will add your user page to:
For other Maryland user templates, please see:
Articles
[edit ]New articles related to Baltimore
[edit ]Please feel free to list your new Baltimore-related articles here (newer articles at the top, please). Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them should be suggested for the Did you know? box on the Main Wikipedia page. DYN has a 72 hr. time limit from the creation of the article.
- John Clark Mayden, 24 December 2020
- Francis M. Wood, 21 December 2019
- Masonville, Baltimore, 17 December 2019
- History of the Syrians in Baltimore, 9 November 2019
Articles to fix
[edit ]- Lauraville, Baltimore, Sep 2022
- Medfield, Baltimore, Sep 2022
- Barclay, Baltimore, Sep 2022
- Park Heights, Baltimore, Sep 2022
Assessment
[edit ]Statistics
[edit ]Baltimore articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 1 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 12 | ||
FL | 2 | 2 | |||||
FM | 1 | 1 | |||||
GA | 6 | 14 | 23 | 2 | 45 | ||
B | 2 | 17 | 57 | 18 | 17 | 111 | |
C | 4 | 18 | 99 | 57 | 88 | 266 | |
Start | 1 | 151 | 132 | 199 | 443 | 926 | |
Stub | 193 | 106 | 153 | 341 | 793 | ||
List | 5 | 11 | 19 | 1 | 36 | ||
Category | 425 | 425 | |||||
Disambig | 3 | 3 | |||||
File | 13 | 13 | |||||
Portal | 2 | 2 | |||||
Project | 9 | 9 | |||||
Redirect | 4 | 3 | 11 | 36 | 54 | ||
Template | 52 | 52 | |||||
Assessed | 7 | 395 | 426 | 488 | 541 | 893 | 2,750 |
Total | 7 | 395 | 426 | 488 | 541 | 893 | 2,750 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 10,875 | Ω = 5.05 |
Quality scale
[edit ]Importance scale
[edit ]The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important".
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Status | Template | Meaning of Status |
---|---|---|
Top | {{Top-Class}} | This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information. With room for exceptions, this typically includes, but is not limited to: |
High | {{High-Class}} | This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge. With room for exceptions, this typically includes, but is not limited to:
|
Mid | {{Mid-Class}} | This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas. With room for exceptions, this typically includes, but is not limited to:
|
Low | {{Low-Class}} | This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia. With room for exceptions, this typically includes, but is not limited to:
|
??? | ??? | Articles of unknown importance to this project. |
NA | NA | Articles where an importance rating is unnecessary. This includes: |
Assessment log
[edit ]- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
February 3, 2025
[edit ]Renamed
[edit ]- Template:County Executives of Baltimore County, Maryland renamed to Template:County executives of Baltimore County, Maryland .
Assessed
[edit ]- Template:County executives of Baltimore County, Maryland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Roger Nolan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
February 2, 2025
[edit ]Removed
[edit ]- The Education Channel (talk) removed.
January 31, 2025
[edit ]Reassessed
[edit ]- Gary Tuggle (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
- Lawrence C. Wroth (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
January 30, 2025
[edit ]Renamed
[edit ]Assessed
[edit ]- Template:Baltimore Ravens presidents (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
January 29, 2025
[edit ]Reassessed
[edit ]- Donald Pomerleau (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Paul Sarbanes (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Index · Statistics · Log