Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Patent nonsense

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia content guideline
"WP:PATENT" redirects here. For the policy on self-published sources, see WP:SPS. For the essay on patents as reliable sources, see WP:PATENTS.
"WP:PN" redirects here. For the how-to guide on creating and modifying editnotices, see WP:EDN. For Wikipedia page names, see WP:Page name. For guide of post-nominal letters, see WP:Manual of Style/Biography § Post-nominal letters.
"WP:NON" redirects here. For the essay about no nazis, see WP:NONAZIS.
Blue tick This page documents an English Wikipedia content guideline.
Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page.
This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia writers and editors improve articles in the site, but sometimes, they contribute patent nonsense. There are various ways to deal with patent nonsense.
Wikipedia guidelines
Behavioral
Discussions
Content
Editing
Categorization
Style
Deletion
Project content
Other
Search

Wikipedia writers and editors contribute a lot of featured and good articles, but occasionally, they contribute some patent nonsense. This falls into two categories:

  1. Total nonsense, e.g. text that purposefully has no relevant meaning at all (e.g. lorem ipsum) and random text (banging on the keyboard).
  2. Content that, while apparently intended to mean something, is so confusing that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it, such as "The land attests that agriculture shafts the uncontrollably mild delicacy and wistfully inanimates the fresh spruce tango jumpsuit impressively in one month" (see word salad). If the meaning cannot be identified, it is impossible to accurately copy-edit the text.

What is not patent nonsense

[edit ]

The following should not be speedily deleted as patent nonsense (though some might meet other speedy-deletion criteria). There are other ways to deal with these things: editing to fix the problem(s); possibly reverting or tagging; or see the deletion policy.

Dealing with patent nonsense

[edit ]

There are various ways to deal with total nonsense—use your good judgment to decide which is most appropriate:

  • Replace it with a well-written article.
  • Move it to the page's talk page.
  • Move it to the user's talk page.
  • Remove it from the article if there is any acceptable content left in the article after that. Often patent nonsense is easy to undo.

Do consider that it might have been a test edit, and don't bite the newbies by calling them vandals in this case, but instead warn them with a personal note or by using the uw-test series of warning templates (Template:Uw-test1). Where vandal intent is clear warn using the uw-vandalism series of warning templates, and report them as vandals if they continue.

However, if a user objects because they believe the content is not patent nonsense, discuss the issue and try to reach a consensus. In particular, if someone offers to rework the "nonsense" into worthwhile content, please allow them reasonable time to do so.

If a page contains nothing but patent nonsense:

  • First, examine the page history to determine whether the patent nonsense present replaced other earlier content. If so, restore the page to the latest revision before the content was replaced by patent nonsense. Warn users responsible for introducing patent nonsense as above.
  • Otherwise, identify it for speedy deletion under the G1 criterion by placing {{db-g1 }} or {{db-nonsense }} at the top of the page. Warn and report as above.

See also

[edit ]
This page is referenced in the Wikipedia Glossary .

Articles

[edit ]
Wikipedia key policies and guidelines (?)
Content (?)
P
G
Conduct (?)
P
G
Deletion (?)
P
Enforcement (?)
P
Editing (?)
P
G
Style
Classification
Project content (?)
G
WMF (?)
P

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /