Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Easydate12/BeNaughty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

WP:FAKEARTICLE. User has no edits in over a year, and none outside their userspace that haven't been deleted. The website does exist, but doesn't appear to be notable from a few quick searches. There's a couple recent press releases and a few passing mentions, but no independent source that I've seen that discusses the site in detail. Onorem ♠ Dil 15:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

• Delete this spammy WP:FAKEARTICLE. A quick look at the history reveals that this page is self-promotional spam. Naturally, the user has not made any edits outside this page and has not edited since 2009. MER-C 06:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete as promotion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.