Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 June 16
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
16 June 2012
[edit ]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
[edit ]- Arthur Thomas Palin (history · last edit) from http://www.wqpmag.com/pioneering-scientist-passes-away. Some text can be traced back to 2006. Permission possible, but creator is blocked. MER-C 03:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Personal trainer accreditation (history · last edit) from http://www.awarding.org.uk/public/aboutus/history. I had previously noted concerns but no known source for other sections of the page at Talk:Personal trainer accreditation; this is a different section. Cnilep (talk) 08:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Article redirected to a non-infringing target. The article conisted almost entirely of copypastes from multiple pages of multiple websites. Redirected to Personal trainer#Accreditation and messages left of talk pages of both articles. --Voceditenore (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Article redirected to a non-infringing target. The article conisted almost entirely of copypastes from multiple pages of multiple websites. Redirected to Personal trainer#Accreditation and messages left of talk pages of both articles. --Voceditenore (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Turkish archery (history · last edit) from http://www.tirendaz.com/en/?page_id=3 . DpmukBOT (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Stubified. Extensive copyvio from the above site + 2 pages on http://www.turkisharchery.info/?p=training, none of which have compatible licenses. --Voceditenore (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Lawrence Knapp (history · last edit) with no source given. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Appears to be a memoir written by a family member. Wildly inappropriate but not a copypaste from anywhere I can find. Besides, it is clearly not a piece of professional writing. --Voceditenore (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Appears to be a memoir written by a family member. Wildly inappropriate but not a copypaste from anywhere I can find. Besides, it is clearly not a piece of professional writing. --Voceditenore (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Secret removers (history · last edit) from http://www.channel4.com/info/press/news/channel-4-commissions-new-daytime-series-secret-removers. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Issue resolved. Bot triggered by eight words in reference title matching title of referenced item --SPhilbrick (Talk) 16:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Issue resolved. Bot triggered by eight words in reference title matching title of referenced item --SPhilbrick (Talk) 16:54, 31 August 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- SMN1 (history · last edit) from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6606. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. --MER-C 13:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. --MER-C 13:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- SMN2 (history · last edit) from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6607. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. --MER-C 13:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. --MER-C 13:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Liao Dynasty (history · last edit) from the book titled Imperial China: 900–1800. Close paraphrase. DpmukBOT (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Apparently the paraphrasing isn't severe enough to warrant blanking or wholesale removal, and an experienced editor is gradually rewriting it [1]. Already listed at Copyright problems#Very old issues. Suggest closing this entry. Voceditenore (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Listing now updated at Copyright problems#Very old issues. Voceditenore (talk) 08:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Apparently the paraphrasing isn't severe enough to warrant blanking or wholesale removal, and an experienced editor is gradually rewriting it [1]. Already listed at Copyright problems#Very old issues. Suggest closing this entry. Voceditenore (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC) [reply ]