Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii no Ma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No rationale for deletion given. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 02:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Wii no Ma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

Very Confusing. About Product. UserBobherry talk Contributions 20:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

• And why should it be deleted, instead of improving it? Reach Out to the Truth 21:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G ·N ·B ·S ·RS ·Talk ) • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

• Speedy keep. No rationale offered for deletion. Elizium23 (talk) 00:33, 10 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

Even if we agreed that there was not enough for an article a merger or redirect to the section on the Wii Channel article for this service would have been the more logical course of action.--70.24.211.105 (talk) 18:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.