Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seta Baker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion . Daniel (talk) 23:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Seta Baker (edit | talk | history  | protect | delete  | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS  · JSTOR · TWL )

I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of this rugby player from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 21:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and New Zealand. JTtheOG (talk) 21:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Can this page please not be deleted as I have been working hard to create pages for provincial players to grow the provincial game, this player has a lot of potential and will likely make Super Rugby next year so page is not worth being deleted.

• Delete Likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. There's not enough coverage yet for a WP:GNG pass. Coverage may exist in the future, but I'm not sure whether or not their would be enough in the next 6 months to justify draftifying. No suitable redirect. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.