Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SNESAmp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:04, 17 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

SNESAmp (edit | talk | history  | protect | delete  | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS  · JSTOR · TWL )

Likely does not meet the GNG, and most sources only cover the software in passing mention with little to no significant coverage. Zero reliable or secondary sources. Written like an advert and if the article is to be saved, it should be TNT'd. InvadingInvader (talk) 20:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Video games, and Software. InvadingInvader (talk) 20:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete per nom. Note that it's been included on Template:Super Nintendo Entertainment System since that template was created but doesn't seem to show up anywhere referenced on its own. Appears to be not notable software. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 21:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.