Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Mulhern
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Lee Mulhern
[edit ]- Lee Mulhern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete ) – (View log)
(削除) I read this article and still don't think he's notable. Ian13 /t 21:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (削除ここまで)
(削除) *Delete The articles sources fail WP:RS Two being from Myspace, and the other not being a full URL (When I tried to open it I got an error message saying that the page was no longer available/or the URL was invalid), and the article makes no indication of WP:N, and after taking a look, I can't find any mention of him in any Reliable Sources. All the Best, --Mifter (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ]
(削除) A7 Member of a non-notable band also up for A7, no assertation of notability anyhwere. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ](削除) Delete There are claims to notability here, now that I think of it (thanks Prodego), but I can't find any reliable sources to back up claims. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:26, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ](削除) Weak neutral per Paul Erik's sources. May just barely make it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ]- Keep per sources. (Wow, I've never changed my !vote thrice before). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 21:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
(削除) Delete per Mifter-- Darth Mike (Talk • Contribs) 22:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ](削除) Delete per the fact that the only verifiable references are Myspace pages, which are not reliable sources per WP:RS. However, no prejudice against recreation if reliable sources can be found and the facts cited verified via the sources. Wiw8 (talk) 22:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (削除ここまで)[reply ]- Comment – Hang on, everyone, while I add some references. There are multiple news articles about him. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 22:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- All right, I've now added references to five articles in major newspapers. One of them is fairly trivial (re his appearance at Buncrana), but the others are non-trivial mentions, and the articles by Donna Carton and by Claire Regan both are entirely about this singer. I would say it's enough for WP:MUSIC criterion #1, or WP:N. Keep. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 17:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Update – I've also added an article by Andrea Clements, which is a feature article about Mulhern. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 17:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Thanks to sources added by Paul Erik. -SpuriousQ (talk) 17:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep thanks to Paul Erik. --GRuban (talk) 18:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep per Paul Erik -- Darth Mike (Talk • Contribs) 19:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep (nominator), go Paul! Ian13 /t 20:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep per the newly added sources. Nice work. Wiw8 (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep and give Paul Erik a A Rescue Barnstar Great job adding sources to the article, IMO it now passes WP:MUSIC, WP:N, and WP:V and I can see no reason why this article should be deleted, GREAT JOB! :). All the Best, Mifter (talk) 03:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.