Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Governor (singer)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. New sources have been added to the article in the course of the AfD. Clear consensus after relisting is that the sources are enough. (non-admin closure) Mkativerata (talk) 18:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Governor (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics )
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )
unsignificant singer, has not released anything of significance yet, fails WP:N, WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO. I cannot find any reliable third party source for his signing to G-Unit. Article should be deleted aand not be recreated until he turns out to be more important. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 21:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Delete No independent coverage, no refs, one sentence article, self advertising... Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 22:34, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 1 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep – Plenty of coverage exists; I'm not sure how it was missed. I've added a sampling just now. The subject easily meets WP:MUSICBIO criterion #1. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep. The coverage now in the article demonstrates notability.--Michig (talk) 05:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Keep Article is informative and doesn't flack, and that's really all that should be asked of music-related articles. Carrite (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- Weak keep. Some inline citations would be nice, but the sources listed will do. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:51, 9 July 2010 (UTC) [reply ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.