Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolve Festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Krakatoa Katie 08:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

Evolve Festival (edit | talk | history  | protect | delete  | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Prodecural nom; seems to be a non-notable music festival. Keilana ^talk 02:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

• Delete. No third-party references. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth} -timed 02:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete - Non-notable, no third-party references. Gromlakh (talk) 02:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
• Any festival from which MuchMusic has broadcast live remotes clearly has to be notable enough for us. Keep; I'll look after improving the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Bearcat (talk) 22:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete per nom. GreenJoe (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
• I added some sources as well—they now include the CBC, the Telegraph-Journal , and The Daily News . It now meets WP:N. Keep. --Paul Erik ^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
• Keep. Now easily meets the notability requirements for secondary sources. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.