Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rabern
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence of notability presented, therefore the result is delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 01:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
David Rabern
[edit ]- David Rabern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats )
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 06:46, 12 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
I am not convinced this person meets the WP:GNG. Sources are either primary or about another topic entirely. The standard set of search links for an AfD results in little usable information. As for the Bay of Pigs claim, that on it's face looks completely bogus. Why would the CIA approach a 20-year old kid for such a sensitive operation? DarkAudit (talk) 02:09, 12 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Delete, notability not established. Appears purely promotional. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:12, 12 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- Comment - This is a close call. The History News Network piece cited in the footnotes looks "good" as an independently published source dealing at length with the subject of this article, even if to debunk certain claims. The intent of this piece does seem promotional, but that is an editing matter. Even if the Bay of Pigs claim is hooey, this is still arguably an encyclopedia-worthy subject as the founder of International Counterintelligence Services (ICS). Carrite (talk) 16:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC) [reply ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.