Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cowboy Whittington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Previously deleted content. Woohookitty ^Woohoo! 08:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

Cowboy Whittington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable dog. No reliable sources --Onorem 22:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

• Keep I'm totally against deleting good articles and this is a nice article. Once again, the dog's more notable than you. He deserves a Wikipedia article and what harm is there in keeping these articles that people keep wanting to delete. IMPROVE Wikipedia - don't DELETE it! Xanucia 23:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
• Speedy delete Just a dog. Claim to fame is being a website "Smart Pet of the Day." Since there's apparently a different one every day, that isn't notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
• OMGGG SOOO CUTE!!!! But sadly delete because being PetSmart's Smart Pet of the Week does not merit an encyclopedia article. Allon Fambrizzi 00:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Allon Fambrizzi[reply ]
• Speedy Delete - None notable dog.--Bryson ^{{Talk}{Edits}} 02:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete. It's a family dog. Whoop-de-do. Mwelch 04:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
• Delete Not notable. Also, information from a personal interview is original research. Maxamegalon2000 05:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]
• Speedy Delete - this article has already been speedy deleted once as nonsense (it was originally posted on April 1 which seems appropriate). If we accept this article we should also allow McDonald's Employee Of The Day, etc etc. andy 08:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.