Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Carl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion . ✗ plicit 12:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Black Carl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL )

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; I hope we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

• Delete - the story of the name is cool, but the article has no evidence of notability except for one regional newspaper. Llajwa (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.