User talk:~2026-42874-46

Information icon Hello, I'm IAmNetx. I noticed that you recently removed content from Theocracy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IAmNetx (talk) 19:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Yes this is in fact a mistake, I only added information to the article and information which made the article better ~2026-42874-46 (talk) 20:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Hi, you did remove quite a few references and other information. When removing content it would still be useful if you could explain why in your edit summary :) IAmNetx (talk) 20:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Yes most references didn't support the claim (they expresses worry or prediction of Israel becoming a theocracy rather than being theocracy) being made which wasn't also wasn't relevant to the point being made given an example where some aspect of civil law are in the hand of religious authorities. Israel system is legacy of the millet system similar to other countries in the area therefore is natural to consider them together situated in their historical context. What are the magic bureaucratic words I'm supposed to say in this case? ~2026-42874-46 (talk) 20:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Explaining in your edit summary that the references didn't support the claim and why would have been enough, no bureaucratic words needed :) IAmNetx (talk) 20:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply

Alright I never made a big edit before just small adjustments ~2026-42874-46 (talk) 21:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Reply