User talk:Theofunny

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New South, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlotte.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I recommend you read this rule of wikipedia. 'He's not a libertarian' is just your personal opinion, sources say otherwise. I'm not a fan of this polititan, but I don't express it by editing on this site. And you shouldnt too Oeleau (talk) 18:22, 11 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

'His MP doused a Jewish menorah.' - because of Mentzen he has been suspended in the party. And that other fragment is really not that straight forward, and I made it quite clear in the article:)Oeleau (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:25, 11 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

The source quoted didn't call him libertarian. He has been described as far right by Reuters as well as NotesfromPoland. Also, there was a statement from him there that was never actually said by him and he also didn't call for Polexit. I've let it be far-right to right wing until consensus can be found. Theofunny (talk) 06:09, 12 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

hey! sorry for reverting, but you're wrong sayong there's nothing like that in the source. In the past, Mentzen has called the EU a totalitarian state, campaigned for Poland to leave and proposed legislation introducing "unbreakable marriage". In 2018, he signed a declaration devoting his public and private life to Jesus. I'm on my phone, so I had no other way of quickly adding the 'totalitarian' bit Oeleau (talk) 06:53, 12 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I see I totally missed the "campaigned for Poland to leave" part. Thank you. Theofunny (talk) 08:20, 12 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

This o[1].

And the edit you removed before did not look like ip vandalism. What exactly dit you think was vandaLiam? Doug Weller talk 17:05, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I think there is a problem with your keyboard. Anyways, I mistakenly thought that the IP removed sourced content but then when I read the page the content I again removed was irrelevant, poorly written and poorly sourced. Theofunny (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Using an iPad is tricky, especially with Parkinson’s. Doug Weller talk 17:16, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I hope you're doing well! Wishing you strength and good days ahead. Theofunny (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

It was written like a lesson is being taught on dehumanizing language which is not related to Trump. Theofunny (talk) 17:09, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Basically I realised later that I reverted my own edit. Theofunny (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

And the gibberish? Doug Weller talk 17:16, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

It was a hyperbole. Sorry. Theofunny (talk) 17:36, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Information icon You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 17:19, 13 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trump derangement syndrome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Cheung.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC) [reply ]