User talk:TheNerdzilla
Hi TheNerdzilla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! ObserveOwl (talk) 13:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Sup ~2026-33470-6 (talk) 14:27, 10 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @TheNerdzilla
- Can you help me to resubmit it Mduh 2.0 (talk) 10:37, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM }} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your antivandalism work, but "unexplained content removal" isn't always a valid reason to revert, and it certainly isn't a reason to edit war. Khine Hnin Wai is a BLP, so you should be especially careful when restoring content to verify that it is appropriately sourced. Also, "controversies" sections are usually bad. lp0 on fire () 10:46, 26 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Sorry about that, and thank you for letting me know! TheNerdzilla (talk) 10:46, 26 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
- No problem. They might be a vandal, but the sources might also be bad. lp0 on fire () 10:52, 26 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
I am the one that did disruptive editing to common house gecko in January.I’m sorry ~2026-33470-6 (talk) 14:26, 10 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, I noticed you tagged Draft:Sportforia for speedy deletion. I have contested the deletion and would appreciate specific feedback on what changes are needed. I am willing to fundamentally rewrite the article to meet encyclopedic standards. Thank you. YanaMladenova (talk) 11:22, 26 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hi TheNerdzilla. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback §When to use rollback.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! * Pppery * in solidarity 00:31, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Thank you very much! TheNerdzilla (talk) 01:27, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
i have reply to your message , did you get it ? i understand nothing on wiki ~2026-42425-84 (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
On the page of Trams in Kolkata 2 users have been seen to repeatedly disrupt the content and remove sourced content. User:Gupsag1998 and User:Tramfankolkata. One of the account has just been created yesterday. I think they're same. How to deal with them? Should I report for sock puppet? Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 12:06, 6 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Hello. I strongly disagree with this allegation.
- Please refrain from making unsupported accusations of sockpuppetry without evidence. Similar editing interests do not constitute proof that two accounts are operated by the same person. If you genuinely believe there is evidence of sockpuppetry, the appropriate course of action is to file a formal investigation through the relevant Wikipedia process rather than making public accusations on talk pages.
- My edits have been based on reliable, verifiable sources and are intended to improve the article. If there are concerns regarding specific edits, I welcome discussion on the content itself in accordance with Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, neutrality, and consensus. Personal allegations do not contribute to resolving content disputes.
- I remain willing to discuss any disputed content constructively and on the basis of reliable sources. Gupsag1998 (talk) 12:14, 6 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- There is evidence indeed. The age of the other account, the lack of references provided to back up the claimed version of the content, the similar disruption pattern on the same exact page, the unwillingness to engage in any discussion, the timing of edits all serve as evidences. Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry,Wikipedia:Consensus are both getting violated by these actions. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- @Gupsag1998, did you use AI to write this comment? 7amiþ reform · solidarity · 💬 · 📊 04:41, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
Tmz reported the alleged split. Which likely is untrue. And almost all rock music oulets seem to report that. And it creating false damaging rumors amongst fans who visit the page. This news is huge and needs to be adressed. ~2026-43584-42 (talk) 10:33, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- It still needs to be sourced, regardless of what it is. TheNerdzilla (talk) 10:34, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
What do mean by source? Does the band have to officially release a statement or does mentioning the news agencies that published it does the job. Please, my aim is to not vandalize a wiki page.Thank you. ~2026-43584-42 (talk) 10:43, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- See Wikipedia:Verifiability for information on Wikipedia's policies regarding verification. TheNerdzilla (talk) 10:44, 7 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
hey, you recently reverted a change on the patuakhali district page made my me, just wanted to say after researching a little bit more, i found out it was wrong, im sorry for the inconvenience, goodbye ~2026-44256-91 (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
I noticed you nominated User:Yume.lol for deletion under CSD G11, which I haven't heard of before. I found these pages on recent changes the other day. Do they also qualify for deletion? I'm pretty new to Wikipedia editing, so I'm not sure. crtbob @talk:~$ ls contribs 09:54, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- Oh they absolutely qualify under the same criteria. Do you want to nominate it for deletion or would you like me to? TheNerdzilla (talk) 09:56, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I should mention the user talk page shouldn't be deleted; instead, remove the spam and put a warning there. TheNerdzilla (talk) 09:57, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply
- I just nominated the sandbox subpage for deletion, but I'm not totally sure what you're describing with the talk page, so I think it's best you handle that. Thanks for the quick reply! crtbob @talk:~$ ls contribs 10:01, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply