User talk:Terabyte646
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautier Cole Killian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash Bobba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.{\displaystyle {\text{Clyde}}2_{3}^{9}} (👋 • 🗣 • ✍️) 00:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hi Terabyte646. Thank you for your work on Gambling Act (Thailand). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this article for Thai legistlation, which has compemporary relevance give recent proposed changes in the law. Remember to add a set of relevant categories for new pages that you create; referencing could also be improved (one unreferenced section).
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
An article you recently created, Thapanee Kiatphaibool, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NenChemist (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2025 (UTC) Reply
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 02:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC) Reply 
Terabyte646 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI )
Request reason:
I had a Wikipedia account with a username that contained personally identifiable information, similar to my social media usernames. I used it for several years to create and edit articles, but after editing some articles related to the US DOGE Service in January 2025, I realized that I could potentially be doxxed (as other journalists had). In response, I renamed the account to "Rattlingbog55", blanked my talk page and requested that my edit history be cleared, which was denied (see below), as a denial typical for such requests. To protect my privacy, I was advised to and decided to start fresh and created a new account "Terabyte646", which I have used since. I have not used the old account to edit. For a while, everything was fine with my new account. However, today I was accused of sockpuppetry and indefinitely blocked. The user who accused me of sockpuppetry also cited two false claims from 2022 that I was editing in exchange for payment as justification for the block, despite the fact that I addressed these claims and created this new account three years (2025) after those false allegations. Terabyte646 (talk) 02:02, 10 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Decline reason:
Declined as per my decline at User talk:Rattlingbog55. In the future, please do not make multiple simultaneous unblock requests across both accounts. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 10 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock }} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks for your contributions to Julapun Amornvivat. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Thaniwan Kulmongkol. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Chatree Wattanakhejorn. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:18, 14 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Kerati Kijmanawat. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:18, 14 March 2025 (UTC) Reply
Following a request by User:Paul_012, I have reviewed this block, and I am no longer comfortable with it. I am unilaterally unblocking this account, and leaving the other blocked. Please contact me if you would prefer to use the other account. PhilKnight (talk) 12:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Hi User:PhilKnight, thank you. Will I be able to continue making contributions from this account? It seems to still prevent me from editing articles with a message that my former account is still blocked. Thanks again.
- Terabyte646 (talk) 15:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Yes, the intention is that you will be able to edit from this account. Sounds like you are autoblocked. I suggest you follow the instructions at WP:AUTOBLOCK. Having said that, I can't find your block in the system, so I suggest you try editing again, just to check another admin hasn't cleared it. PhilKnight (talk) 16:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Thanks, User:PhilKnight, I followed the instructions for unblocking when I am unable to edit my talk page and created an appeal through the Autoblock appeal form. It also said "We were not able to locate your block. Please click the button below to correct the information in your appeal." So I am wondering if it has to do with my original account still being blocked. I am happy to use the other account instead of this one if it makes this process easier. On my user page, it still says "This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of" (my former, and currently blocked account)—so I don't know if it just takes some time to be removed or if there is something else I need to do from my end. Terabyte646 (talk) 22:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Yes, the intention is that you will be able to edit from this account. Sounds like you are autoblocked. I suggest you follow the instructions at WP:AUTOBLOCK. Having said that, I can't find your block in the system, so I suggest you try editing again, just to check another admin hasn't cleared it. PhilKnight (talk) 16:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
{{Unblock-auto |see above|PhilKnight}} Terabyte646 (talk) 23:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- I have deleted the user pages which contained sock puppetry notices. I have unblocked the other account to see if that was causing the problem. Please try editing again. As far as I can tell. you should be able to edit. PhilKnight (talk) 23:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- It's working now. Thank you again. Terabyte646 (talk) 03:08, 21 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
- I have deleted the user pages which contained sock puppetry notices. I have unblocked the other account to see if that was causing the problem. Please try editing again. As far as I can tell. you should be able to edit. PhilKnight (talk) 23:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Elizabeth Dulau. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vestrian24Bio 10:23, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Reply
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Paul Chambers (academic) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prosecution of Paul Chambers. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 07:12, 2 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hi. I noticed that you seem to be using thai-language.com to generate RTGS strings for names. I don't know if you were following the suggestion I added at Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand/Style guide, but if so, I might have to take that back. For people's names, the tool seems to give more incorrect results than useful ones. (This is because Thai names are often built on Sanskrit root words that the tool is unable to recognise). It's probably better to just leave the RTGS/IPA missing until a human comes by who can add them. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:44, 13 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Also, I have another thing to discuss, but it might involve sensitive info so could you perhaps enable receiving email in your user preferences? (Or send me an email if you don't mind sharing yours.) --Paul_012 (talk) 07:51, 13 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Just sent you an email!
- Terabyte646 (talk) 14:31, 13 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hi Terabyte646. Thank you for your work on Ari, Bangkok. Another editor, Johnson524, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for creating this page, have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Johnson524}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hi Terabyte646. Thank you for your work on Pichet Chuamuangpan. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjani Sinha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Stefano Rabolli Pansera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Rabolli Pansera. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 15:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Kolae (cooking). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and None of the sources mention this term.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 15:32, 29 July 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Witkoff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.I appreciate your thanks for my edit on Students Supporting Israel but you're the second person to thank me for an edit that's a pretty minor fixing of a typo. Just wondering what that's about ^_^; I EAT PINBALLS (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2025 (UTC) Reply
- Oh you've contributed a lot to that page. I see now :] I EAT PINBALLS (talk) 00:15, 12 September 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eve Palasak, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Eve_Palasak&preloadparams%5b%5d=1310947915"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:03, 12 September 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Solana (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Thanks for your contributions to Ilan Sinelnikov. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and needs more sources about Ilan, rather than SSI. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:09, 16 September 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Raab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Information icon Hello, Terabyte646. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chatree Wattanakhejorn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Reingold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzy Weiss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Republican group chat leaks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:03, 16 October 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan McCormack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrest of Tom Alexandrovich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hello, Terabyte646. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chatree Wattanakhejorn".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM }} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC) Reply
Category:Peranakan people in Thailand has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hi Terabyte646. Thank you for your work on Alexis Wilkins. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hello Terrabyte646, I'm from the world of cycling, but new to Wikipedia. I would be happy to get professional advice from you. Could you please email me? send me an email
Thank you Cycscott (talk) 14:26, 16 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niramon Serisakul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The Kora Person (come say hi!) 03:42, 21 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article Kevin Christie (Connecticut politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Being mayor-equivalent of a fairly small city is insufficient to pass WP:NPOL
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Reywas92 Talk 03:14, 23 December 2025 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello, Terabyte646. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julapun Amornvivat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello, Terabyte646. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thaniwan Kulmongkol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Kleban until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murray Hunter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hi Terabyte646. Thank you for your work on Ben Thanh–Can Gio metro. Another editor, Kingsacrificer, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Some of the information added and cited was not present in the referenced pages. Make sure to cross-verify every bit of information you input in the article with the original information sources. I have removed the unsourced information. Now this looks good to go.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kingsacrificer}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lauren Bis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Lauren_Bis&preloadparams%5b%5d=1332503392"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Bis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Rama II Road crane collapse, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can 2026_Rama_II_Road_crane_collapse&preloadparams%5b%5d=1333011957"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hi Terabyte646. Thank you for your work on Sarah B. Rogers. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for taking the time to write this article! Your contributions are greatly appreciated. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hello, Terabyte646,
Thank you for creating Joseph Rodden.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thanks for writing this. To improve it, I'd recommend trimming the quotations down to just the most relevant ones.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lp0 on fire}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
lp0 on fire () 14:47, 17 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
- You can now add the quotes to q:James Rodden which I've started, if you so wish. lp0 on fire () 11:08, 25 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tricia McLaughlin (government official) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 22:16, 21 January 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attempted entry of Consulate of Ecuador, Minneapolis, by ICE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hello, Terabyte646. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Julapun Amornvivat".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, Terabyte646. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Thaniwan Kulmongkol".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello, Terabyte646. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ilan Sinelnikov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, Terabyte646,
Thank you for creating Justin Fox (DOGE employee).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Appears to be notable for a lawsuit, not for himself
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|49ersBelongInSanFrancisco}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:52, 14 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, Terabyte646. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ilan Sinelnikov".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Gruenbaum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:07, 31 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Isaan Record, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can The_Isaan_Record&preloadparams%5b%5d=1346815913"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:05, 3 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Chiang Mai Smog, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can 2026_Chiang_Mai_Smog&preloadparams%5b%5d=1346821692"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:02, 3 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page American Housing Corporation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can American_Housing_Corporation&preloadparams%5b%5d=1347498044"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omri Morgenshtern until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.
Thanks for uploading File:Dusit Central Park logo.svg . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mon Mothma's Senate Speech, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Mon_Mothma%27s_Senate_Speech&preloadparams%5b%5d=1351965632"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:48, 1 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Americans in the Israel Defense Forces until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict , a topic designated as contentious . This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware }} template.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Americans in the Israel Defense Forces, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can List_of_Americans_in_the_Israel_Defense_Forces&preloadparams%5b%5d=1356265039"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:51, 26 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dovi Safier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mon Mothma's Senate Speech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Housing Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mon Mothma's Senate Speech, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mon Mothma's Senate Speech until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 3 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Oliner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Hi! I redirected White South African refugees in the US (60 Minutes segment) to White South African refugee program (WP:BLAR). The article was outdated - it looks like the episode discussed aired on February 22: 60 Minutes season 58. The topic was probably not notable enough to have its own article; the content can reasonably be included at White South African refugee program, 60 Minutes season 58, or 60 Minutes. Dreamyshade (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian McGinnis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apartheid-Free Communities until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.The Bushranger One ping only 21:47, 20 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
Nomination of 2024–2026 Israeli–United States espionage cases for merging into Israeli espionage in the United States#2024–2026_Israeli–United_States_espionage_cases
[edit ]The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024–2026 Israeli–United States espionage cases until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elias Irizarry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.Thanks for your contributions to True Digital Park. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ScalarFactor (talk) 22:37, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to Blood Copper. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and relies too much on primary sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BOVINEBOY 2008 18:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC) Reply