User talk:TenshiSWR
Welcome!
[edit ]Hi TenshiSWR! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Edcolins (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Thank you very much Edcolins. Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- You're welcome! Note that you may want to change the link that is within brackets in your signature from "Talk:TenshiSWR" to "User talk:TenshiSWR". Perhaps this is the link you intended to include. Edcolins (talk) 14:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- I didn't notice that, thanks again. Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- You're welcome! Note that you may want to change the link that is within brackets in your signature from "Talk:TenshiSWR" to "User talk:TenshiSWR". Perhaps this is the link you intended to include. Edcolins (talk) 14:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Is a sockpuppet of Piermark. I would advise reporting to AIV or simply leaving him be. See also Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Piermark Jay Cubby 22:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Hi User:JayCubby, I wasn't aware of that at the time, and assumed good faith anyway. I'll remember this for the future, thanks. Tenshi! (Talk page) 22:44, 20 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Piermark isn't the nastiest of the LTAs (in that he mostly posts weird screeds and is less likely than some to dox). Cheers. Jay Cubby 22:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
I reverted your changes; the links I added are appropriate and link to the page for each chapter delineated within the wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HatzalahWiki (talk • contribs) 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- @HatzalahWiki: See WP:SPAM#External link spamming and MOS:LINKS. Links should not be in the article body. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I understand - in this case, the external links are neither spam nor promotional. At some point, I can add them to a reference block, or if you're up for the challenge, please feel free to tackle before me! HatzalahWiki (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Kindly do not revert. I made many (many) more changes beyond the links. When you revert, you're undoing all of them. I will be happy to address the links as noted below or, f you have bandwidth, please feel free, however please do not revert again. Thank you! HatzalahWiki (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Links addressed; thank you. HatzalahWiki (talk) 19:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- Kindly do not revert. I made many (many) more changes beyond the links. When you revert, you're undoing all of them. I will be happy to address the links as noted below or, f you have bandwidth, please feel free, however please do not revert again. Thank you! HatzalahWiki (talk) 19:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I understand - in this case, the external links are neither spam nor promotional. At some point, I can add them to a reference block, or if you're up for the challenge, please feel free to tackle before me! HatzalahWiki (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit ]
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious . This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware }} template.
Barkeep49 (talk) 20:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
Declined speedy deletion: Draft:Jenny Browne
[edit ]Hi there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I wanted to let you know I have declined your G12 speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jenny Browne because the copyrighted information can be pruned from the article. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions, comments, and/or concerns regarding this matter. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
The Signpost: 7 February 2025
[edit ]- Recent research: GPT-4 writes better edit summaries than human Wikipedians
- News and notes: Let's talk!
- Opinion: Fathoms Below, but over the moon
- Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5 has closed
- Traffic report: A wild drive