Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

User talk:Shashi Boinapalli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is Shashi Boinapalli's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
YouTube and their website nor any publication affiliated with them are not reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. S0091 (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC) [reply ]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Shashi Boinapalli! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk . If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse , a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC) [reply ]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This submission appears to be taken from https://sfvedanta.org/the-society/history/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tonethis includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. S0091 (talk) 00:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit ]

Information icon Hello, Shashi Boinapalli. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Vedanta Society of Northern California, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 00:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The writing style is completely wrong for an encyclopedia article
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Information icon Hello, Shashi Boinapalli. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vedanta Society of Northern California, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit ]

Hello, Shashi Boinapalli. Thank you for your work on Vedanta Society of San Francisco. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

considering the website points to Vedanta Society - San Francisco, this should be okay to use

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 00:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Thank you, very much for approving this.
Thanks,
Shashi. 76.102.91.23 (talk) 06:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
[edit ]

Control copyright icon Hello Shashi Boinapalli! Your additions to Swami Tattwamayananda have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission .) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Problems with upload of File:Swami-Tapasyananda-As-We-Knew-Him.jpg

[edit ]

Thanks for uploading File:Swami-Tapasyananda-As-We-Knew-Him.jpg . You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Swami Tattwamayananda moved to draftspace

[edit ]

Thanks for your contributions to Swami Tattwamayananda. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Nomination of Swami Tattwamayananda for deletion

[edit ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swami Tattwamayananda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Tattwamayananda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Swami Tattwamayananda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Tattwamayananda. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

February 2025

[edit ]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary or a comment that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MimirIsSmart (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Information icon Thank you for your work on Swami Tattwamayananda. Not all topics are notable (suitable for a stand-alone Wikipedia article). The Swami Tattwamayananda article does not cite sources establishing notability, so it may get deleted. A source shows that the article topic is notable when it:

If you can find notability-establishing sources, please add them: more than one is needed unless the applicable subject-specific notability guideline states otherwise. Specific questions can be answered live at the Teahouse help forum. Thank you. And do not recreate Swami Tattwamayananda. It has been deleted several times. You may be blocked from editing if you keep on creating articles that are not suitable for Wikipedia.rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:55, 22 February 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /