User talk:San1924
Information icon Hello, I'm Vegantics. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Vegantics (talk) 19:49, 20 May 2026 (UTC) Reply
LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.
These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:
- hallucinations : they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
- unencyclopedic tone : they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
- copyright issues : they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.
See the advice page on large language models for more information.- provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent : not connected to the subject, such as the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Kicksecure to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk , or on the reviewer's talk page .
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
- I am the author of this draft. I’m rewriting the content to address your tone concerns and replacing the directory-style references with independent secondary analysis. Please clarify exactly what you require for 'significant coverage' so I can provide the correct evidence San1924 (talk) 06:46, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- It needs to be long enough that the draft becomes a summary of those reliable sources. It's not correct to write a draft and then source, see WP:BACKWARDS. The WP:GOLDENRULE gives a basic definition of the sort of sources we need here. ChrysGalley (talk) 07:01, 6 June 2026 (UTC) Reply
- provide significant coverage : discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable : from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent : not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Kicksecure to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk , or on the reviewer's talk page .
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Hey San1924, the third annual Developing Countries WikiContest is now open for submissions. Welcome to the contest! You can now list your work at your submissions page to earn points. We hope that you enjoy participating in this drive to fight Wikipedia's systemic bias. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:
- New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions on the talk page.
- Got open nominations? List them at the review requests sidebar.
- Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
- Not sure if your article qualifies? See the scoring rules for more information or contact a coordinator.
- Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open throughout the contest, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!
On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs ), Generalissima (talk · contribs ), Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs ), sawyer777 (talk · contribs ), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs ). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 01:13, 19 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Hello, thanks for your interest in Talk:History of Paraguay/GA1. Would you be able to expand on the points you raised there? You say for example "Several concrete claims in the historical narrative (specifically regarding the Francia era) currently lack sufficient inline citations", but do not give examples. It is also helpful if you can add which sources you checked to evaluate this. Thanks, CMD (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
@CMD: Hi, thank you for reaching out so politely. To be completely transparent, that specific critique about the Francia era was a drafting error on my end. I used a tool to help format and polish my raw review notes, and it unfortunately hallucinated that specific point about the citations. I apologize for any wild goose chase or confusion that caused.
- Due to this error and my broader experience on the platform recently, I am withdrawing my review and stepping away from editing and the DCW contest for the foreseeable future to take a break. Best of luck to you and the other editors with the History of Paraguay article. San1924 (talk) 13:25, 21 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, as LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 05:31, 20 July 2026 (UTC) Reply
The 2026 Developing Countries WikiContest has been running for a month now, so let's check in with the competition so far!
As of the time of writing, our top contestants are:
- Nigeria Vanderwaalforces (submissions) ahead of the pack with 715 points, with two FAs and many GAs on the monarchs of the Kingdom of Benin;
- Simongraham (submissions) with 291 points, mostly with GAs on jumping spiders, alongside various GAN and FAC reviews;
- Jaguarnik (submissions) with 240 points, mostly from an FA on the 1945 film Ivan the Terrible;
- Grnrchst (submissions) with 215 points, mostly from GAs on anarchist history in various countries, alongside many GA reviews, and;
- Vestrian24Bio (submissions) tied for 4th with 215 points, with an FL and four GAs on Indian cricket!
These competitors are in the lead, but if past experience is any indication, big shake-ups might still await us in the contest. If you're looking for a way to boost your position, we got a table of review requests from fellow participants—you can rack up a lot of points through reviews, and it might just convince others to review your own nominations! You can also look through the eligible reviews page to find other articles to review, with highlights for articles eligible for the ×ばつ multiplier. The coordinators would like to thank Jaguarnik (submissions) for his work to keep this page up to date.
Thank you so much for all your work in the contest so far, dear participants, and keep on the good fight against systemic bias on our wiki! Have any questions? Leave a message on the contest talk page or send it to one of our wonderful coordinators: Arconning (talk ·contribs ), Generalissima (talk ·contribs ), MagenticManifestations (talk ·contribs ), sawyer777 (talk ·contribs ), and TechnoSquirrel69 (talk ·contribs ). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 05:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC) Reply