User talk:Rollinginhisgrave

Index

---

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

If you are coming from Talk:Donald Trump/Response to claims of bias and are looking for assistance, leave a comment below, followed by ~~~~ and you will be responded to shortly.

A belated thanks for reviewing St. John's Shaughnessy for GA status. You left lots of good feedback that I will use to improve the article. I appreciate the work you put into the review! Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

No worries Dclemens1971, glad it helped. I'm sure the next nomination will be in better shape. For architecture works, a place to look for emulating style/sources would be User:Epicgenius/Quality article contributions. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:44, 23 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

The article History of chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:History of chocolate for comments about the article, and Talk:History of chocolate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 13:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

The article Chocolate in savory cooking you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chocolate in savory cooking for comments about the article, and Talk:Chocolate in savory cooking/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Royiswariii -- Royiswariii (talk) 09:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

The article Dark chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dark chocolate for comments about the article, and Talk:Dark chocolate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CosXZ -- CosXZ (talk) 19:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

The article White chocolate you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:White chocolate and Talk:White chocolate/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Szmenderowiecki -- Szmenderowiecki (talk) 03:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

The article White chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:White chocolate for comments about the article, and Talk:White chocolate/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Szmenderowiecki -- Szmenderowiecki (talk) 12:05, 18 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Re: [1]

If you give a man a fish, he will eat today, but teach a man to fish and he will eat forever.

I.e., you haven't done them any favors in the long term. ―Mandruss ☎ 01:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Mandruss I certainly don't disagree, but this falls pretty firmly into WP:NOTBURO: potentially legitimate concerns not being addressed because they were raised in the wrong venue. Letting it languish, not being addressed to motivate them to be proactive is pointy. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 01:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

I could not disagree more strongly. Process and organization are not bureaucracy, and perhaps you would benefit from more experience with discussions that mix topics. Remember, if consensus 8 is canceled, it will link to that discussion. According to you, it will be a great idea for it to include a lot of discussion completely unrelated to the cancellation of consensus 8. ―Mandruss ☎ 01:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Mandruss I think my actions aligned exactly with what you are saying: I moved the discussion to a new thread to prevent this. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 01:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

And back to my initial comment. ―Mandruss ☎ 01:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

And back to my second? Haha. Hope you're well. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 01:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Me too. ―Mandruss ☎ 02:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Cessaune this is so kind, thankyou. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 09:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

It seems like you have quite some edits on chocolate, and I wonder, why have you removed blond chocolate from Types_of_chocolate article, on your edit on September 7th?

I wanted to respawn it to the article, but I want to discuss it with you before that.

I'd like to give you some arguments for Blonde Chocolate as a Type:

• Unique Flavor Profile: The Maillard reactions alter the flavor profile of white chocolate, giving it a distinct taste that sets it apart.
• Different Production Process: The specific heating and stirring process involved in creating blonde chocolate is different from the standard white chocolate production.
• Distinct Appearance: The golden color of blonde chocolate is noticeably different from the traditional white color of white chocolate.

Ruby chocolate is considered as a type, not a milk chocolate variant of ruby cocoa. It also satisfies all the above. So why not blond chocolate?

I would appreciate your answer. 141.226.144.100 (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi IP, thanks for putting this together. A lot of it is irrelevant to Wikipedia, it doesn't really matter if we can argue the case that it is a "type" of chocolate distinct from white chocolate, it matters how reliable sources discuss that. The most reliable sources I have seen discussing blonde chocolate as a type frame it from the perspective of Valronha's lobbying efforts for governmental recognition as a distinct type. This distinction is not endorsed therein. Don't worry too much about how types of chocolate looks at the moment, I'm going to work on it once I get all the sub articles to good article status. I'll move this to the article talk page when I'm not on my phone later, but in the meantime you can respond here. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi Rollinginhisgrave,

Thanks for your reply! I completely understand your point about reliable sources.

Honestly, I wasn't aware of the industry politics behind blonde chocolate (not from the US here). I initially looked for info on Wikipedia after a friend mentioned Maillard reactions creating its flavor. Since I couldn't find it, I added a short section based on this source. I also added a sentence about its short history.

Originally, I even put it under the white chocolate section because I wasn't sure of its classification.

I agree that regulatory recognition is important, but I also think the types list should reflect culinary characteristics. Ruby chocolate is another example, right?

I hope your reorganization of the chocolate articles will include the removed blonde chocolate information.

Flin00 (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Pbritti apologies for the late thankyou here, but I'm really grateful for this note. Hope you're well. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rogue Chocolatier you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 01:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi -- I saw your response to my comments at the FAC. I'd be happy to help at the article talk page, whenever you get time to work on it again. I think my first suggestion would be to sketch out the overall tree of articles that should ultimately exist in order to get a clearer picture of what belongs in this article. I suspect there's enough material in reliable sources for specialized articles such as history of chocolate manufacturing -- after all we do already have history of Cadbury which would be a child article of that. That would imply that history of chocolate would be in summary style, which is tricky if some of the subarticles haven't been written yet. Anyway, I have the article on my watchlist and look forward to seeing what happens to it. ~~ Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, Rollinginhisgrave! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Yue 🌙 21:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

The article Rogue Chocolatier you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rogue Chocolatier and Talk:Rogue Chocolatier/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Are you planning to include cocoa production in Japan in that draft of yours? Because if so, then I'll hold off on my intended writeup of that topic. Cheers. Yue 🌙 05:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Yue I probably would try to merge it in, as to my understanding, Japan's cocoa production is primarily for domestic purposes (although I may be incorrect here). I won't have time to write up the article for a while, but if you do want to write Chocolate in Japan mainly about cocoa production and leave some cursory notes on history, culture and industry (even just based on the journal articles I've left in the draft), I may be able to come by later and expand. I understand if you want to nominate it for GA for the cup this may not work.

I was actually going to request you write a broad-concept article on cocoa production in Africa, which I think is sufficiently sourced for stand-alone notability and would help navigation. Hope you're well regardless. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Rollinginhisgrave: For this specific topic, I wasn't considering aiming for GA status; I just wanted the article to exist. I also inquired because I didn't want us to overlap our work. Good luck with chocolate in Japan in the long run; I may end up writing cocoa production in Africa in the future but not soon, so you might beat me to it! Cheers. Yue 🌙 01:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I had the impression you were committed to the sorely needed reduction of Donald Trump—and you're probably the only editor with the personality, knowledge, and skills to accomplish that. Haven't seen you in awhile; was I mistaken, or have you had a change of heart?

Never mind that you were an asset there in general. ―Mandruss ☎ 22:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hey Mandruss. I haven't much time for wiki at the moment with other commitments. Getting the Trump page to meet NPOV is an exciting challenge, so hopefully I will be able to return, although I didn't much enjoy coming into conversations knowing the positions of many editors based on what I perceived to be their politics. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 01:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I was thinking more about reduction than NPOV. One or two are doing piecemeal trimming, but that's not going to get the article to where it needs to be. perceived to be their politics I share the perception. All the more need for folks like you. And they of course perceive the same about you and me; I'm regularly accused of being one of a cabal of Trump apologists. I just chuckle to myself. ―Mandruss ☎ 02:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

The article Rogue Chocolatier you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rogue Chocolatier for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I think you need to read wp:bludgeon. Slatersteven (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Slatersteven Thanks for the note. I do think new points are being engaged, but it is a little WP:1AM. I'll bring it to WP:NPOV/N and leave it in their hands if I am repeating myself (or if you think I'm repeating myself). Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hey Rollinginhisgrave, there was a recent post on Bluesky highlighting your work on chocolate articles. It has more than 6000 likes and a bunch of replies, almost entirely positive. You have been dubbed "chocolate hero"! Thanks for all you do here, chocolate-related and otherwise. P.S. out of curiosity, whose grave does your username refer to? Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Crunchydillpickle Oh thanks for letting me know :) it's funny to read, and gives me far too much credit over other editors working on chocolate articles such as Zacharie Grossen , Yue and Zefr .

My username refers to the expression itself rather than commenting on any grave. It's being referenced in a similar way to Wikipedia:UPPERCASE#WP:NOTCENSORED. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 08:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi RIHG, I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to thank you for the perspectives you added to my All-American Bitch FAC. They were beneficial to the article's ascent to FA status. Would you be interested in reviewing this similarly-sized article, also for the FAC process? It is totally fine if you do not have the time or interest. I hope the new year is going well for you so far.--N Ø 17:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

From your comment, 'I've been working on trimming the inter-presidency section.' If you are also planning to trim or condense that full section, could you let me know how it is going for the trimmed version and when do you plan it? ErnestKrause (talk) 21:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Thanks for your comment on the law suits. I've tried a second version of the edit to trim all 4 subsections into a shortened version. ErnestKrause (talk) 01:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Nice of you to leave your comment on the condense and trims edit for the Trump rhetoric section. I'm starting to think that the 2 paragraph trimmed version is not sufficient, and have tried to do a version that goes to 3 paragraphs which I'll place here (you can remove it and archive it after reading) to ask about whether you think it is better or not. Here is it in 3 paragraphs now:

Political practice and rhetoric

Beginning with his 2016 campaign, Trump's politics and rhetoric led to the creation of a political movement known as Trumpism.^[2] Trump's political positions are populist,^{[3] [4]} more specifically described as right-wing populist.^{[5] [6]} He helped bring far-right fringe ideas and organizations into the mainstream.^[7] Many of Trump's actions and rhetoric have been described as authoritarian and contributing to democratic backsliding.^{[8] [9]} His political base has been compared to a cult of personality.^[a] Trump's rhetoric and actions inflame anger and exacerbate distrust through an "us" versus "them" narrative.^[17] Trump explicitly and routinely disparages racial, religious, and ethnic minorities,^[18] and scholars consistently find that racial animus regarding blacks, immigrants, and Muslims are the best predictors of support for Trump.^[19] Trump's rhetoric has been described as using fearmongering and demagogy.^{[20] [21]} The alt-right movement coalesced around and supported his candidacy, due in part to its opposition to multiculturalism and immigration.^{[22] [23] [24]} He has a strong appeal to evangelical Christian voters and Christian nationalists,^[25] and his rallies take on the symbols, rhetoric and agenda of Christian nationalism.^[26]

Many of Trump's comments and actions have been described as racist.^[27] Trump has been identified as a key figure in increasing political violence in America, both for and against him.^{[28] [29] [30]} Before and throughout his presidency, Trump promoted numerous conspiracy theories, including Obama birtherism, the Clinton body count conspiracy theory, the conspiracy theory movement QAnon, the Global warming hoax theory, Trump Tower wiretapping allegations, that Osama bin Laden was alive and Obama and Biden had members of Navy SEAL Team 6 killed, and alleged Ukrainian interference in U.S. elections.^{[31] [32] [33] [34] [35]} As a candidate and as president, Trump frequently makes false statements in public remarks^{[36] [37]} to an extent unprecedented in American politics.^{[36] [38] [39]} Trump's social media presence attracted worldwide attention after he joined Twitter in 2009. He tweeted frequently during his 2016 campaign and as president until Twitter banned him after the January 6 attack.^[40] In June 2017, the White House press secretary said that Trump's tweets were official presidential statements.^[41] After years of criticism for allowing Trump to post misinformation and falsehoods, Twitter began to tag some of his tweets with fact-checks in May 2020.^[42] In response, he tweeted that social media platforms "totally silence" conservatives and that he would "strongly regulate, or close them down".^[43] In the days after the storming of the Capitol, he was banned from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other platforms.^[44] The loss of his social media presence diminished his ability to shape events^{[45] [46]} and prompted a dramatic decrease in the volume of misinformation shared on Twitter.^[47]

Trump sought media attention throughout his career, sustaining a "love-hate" relationship with the press.^[48] In the 2016 campaign, he benefited from a record amount of free media coverage.^[49] The first Trump presidency reduced formal press briefings from about a hundred in 2017 to about half that in 2018 and to two in 2019; they also revoked the press passes of two White House reporters, which were restored by the courts.^[50] Trump's 2020 presidential campaign sued The New York Times, The Washington Post, and CNN for defamation in opinion pieces about Trump's stance on Russian election interference. All the suits were dismissed. The Atlantic characterized the suits as an intimidation tactic.^{[51] [52]} By 2024, he repeatedly voiced support for outlawing political dissent and criticism,^[53] and said that reporters should be prosecuted for not divulging confidential sources and media companies should possibly lose their broadcast licenses for unfavorable coverage of him.^[54] In 2024, Trump sued ABC News for defamation after George Stephanopoulos said on-air that a jury had found him civilly liable for raping E. Jean Carroll. The case was settled in December with ABC's parent company, Walt Disney, apologizing for the inaccurate claims about Trump and agreeing to donate 15ドル million to Trump's future presidential library.^{[55] [56] [57]}

Sources

^ Baio, Ariana (November 6, 2024). "Trump made MAGA hats a staple of his campaign. More than 2 million are now on the streets". The Independent . Retrieved December 25, 2024. ^ O'Brien, Timothy L. (November 1, 2024). "The Peculiarly American Roots of Trumpism". Bloomberg News . Retrieved November 26, 2024. ^ Ross 2024, p. 298, "In 2016, a populist won the presidential election in the United States.". sfn error: no target: CITEREFRoss2024 (help) ^ Urbinati 2019. sfn error: no target: CITEREFUrbinati2019 (help) ^ Campani et al. 2022. sfn error: no target: CITEREFCampaniConcepciónSolerSavín2022 (help) ^ Chotiner, Isaac (July 29, 2021). "Redefining Populism". The New Yorker . Retrieved October 14, 2021. ^ Bierman, Noah (August 22, 2016). "Donald Trump helps bring far-right media's edgier elements into the mainstream". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved October 7, 2021. ^ Parker & Towler 2019, p. 505; 513, "The rise of Donald Trump, however, forces scholars to apprehend why the country is trending toward authoritarianism, complete with a renegade executive and party loyalists willing to permit him to govern as he sees fit. Again, this is not the first time the United States has confronted authoritarianism. ... We must also say something about the much-discussed topic of authoritarianism and the election of Donald Trump. By now, several books, including How Democracies Die, have identified Trump as an authoritarian.". sfn error: no target: CITEREFParkerTowler2019 (help) ^ Kaufman & Haggard 2019. sfn error: no target: CITEREFKaufmanHaggard2019 (help) ^ Sundahl 2022, "[In] a model for distinguishing between popularity and personality cults based on three parameters covering a representational and social practice dimension... Trump and Putin belong in the domain of personality cults". sfn error: no target: CITEREFSundahl2022 (help) ^ Franks & Hesami 2021, "Results of the current study... may lend credence to accusations that some Trump supporters have a cult-like loyalty to the 45th president". sfn error: no target: CITEREFFranksHesami2021 (help) ^ Adams 2021, p. 256. sfn error: no target: CITEREFAdams2021 (help) ^ Reyes 2020, p. 869. sfn error: no target: CITEREFReyes2020 (help) ^ Diamond 2023, p. 96, "The cult of Trumpism fosters and exploits paranoia and allegiance to an all-powerful, charismatic figure, contributing to a social milieu at risk for the erosion of democratic principles and the rise of fascism". sfn error: no target: CITEREFDiamond2023 (help) ^ Hassan 2019, p. xviii, "...Trump employs many of the same techniques as prominent cult leaders". sfn error: no target: CITEREFHassan2019 (help) ^ Ben-Ghiat, Ruth (December 19, 2020). "Op-Ed: Trump's formula for building a lasting personality cult". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved October 4, 2023. ^ Ross 2024, p. 299, "Through his rhetoric and action, Trump inflamed anger and exacerbated distrust in a way that deepened the divide between the "us" and the "them"". sfn error: no target: CITEREFRoss2024 (help) ^ Stephens-Dougan 2021, p. 302, "Trump, however, managed to achieve electoral success in 2016 despite routinely using racial appeals that openly and categorically disparaged racial, religious, and ethnic minorities, or what the racial priming literature refers to as explicit racial appeals. ... Throughout his campaign and subsequent presidency, Trump continued to traffic in similar explicit racial appeals". sfn error: no target: CITEREFStephens-Dougan2021 (help) ^ Berman 2021, p. 76, "In the United, States scholars consistently find that "racial animus," or attitudes regarding "blacks, immigrants, Muslims" are the best predictors of support for President Trump". sfn error: no target: CITEREFBerman2021 (help) ^ Haberman, Maggie (September 11, 2024). "'The End of Our Country': Trump Paints Dark Picture at Debate". The New York Times . Retrieved September 25, 2024. Fear-mongering, and demagoguing on the issue of immigrants, has been Mr. Trump's preferred speed since he announced his first candidacy for the presidency in June 2015, and he has often found a receptive audience for it. ^ Mercieca, Jennifer R. (2020). Demagogue for President: The Rhetorical Genius of Donald Trump. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-1-62349-906-8. ^ Weigel, David (August 20, 2016). "'Racialists' are cheered by Trump's latest strategy". The Washington Post . Retrieved June 23, 2018. ^ Krieg, Gregory (August 25, 2016). "Clinton is attacking the 'Alt-Right' – What is it?". CNN . Retrieved August 25, 2016. ^ Pierce, Matt (September 20, 2020). "Q&A: What is President Trump's relationship with far-right and white supremacist groups?". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved October 7, 2021. ^ Perry, Whitehead & Grubbs 2021, p. 229. sfn error: no target: CITEREFPerryWhiteheadGrubbs2021 (help) ^ Peter, Smith (May 18, 2024). "Jesus is their savior, Trump is their candidate. Ex-president's backers say he shares faith, values". AP News . Retrieved November 23, 2024. ^ Multiple sources: Lopez, German (February 14, 2019). "Donald Trump's long history of racism, from the 1970s to 2019". Vox . Retrieved June 15, 2019. Desjardins, Lisa (January 12, 2018). "Every moment in Trump's charged relationship with race". PBS NewsHour . Retrieved January 13, 2018. Dawsey, Josh (January 11, 2018). "Trump's history of making offensive comments about nonwhite immigrants". The Washington Post . Retrieved January 11, 2018. Weaver, Aubree Eliza (January 12, 2018). "Trump's 'shithole' comment denounced across the globe". Politico . Retrieved January 13, 2018. Stoddard, Ed; Mfula, Chris (January 12, 2018). "Africa calls Trump racist after 'shithole' remark". Reuters . Retrieved October 1, 2019. ^ Baker, Peter (September 16, 2024). "Trump, Outrage and the Modern Era of Political Violence". The New York Times . Retrieved January 20, 2025. At the heart of today's eruption of political violence is Mr. Trump, a figure who seems to inspire people to make threats or take actions both for him and against him. He has long favored the language of violence in his political discourse, encouraging supporters to beat up hecklers, threatening to shoot looters and undocumented migrants, mocking a near-fatal attack on the husband of the Democratic House speaker and suggesting that a general he deemed disloyal be executed. ^ Nacos, Shapiro & Bloch-Elkon 2020. sfn error: no target: CITEREFNacosShapiroBloch-Elkon2020 (help) ^ Piazza & Van Doren 2022. sfn error: no target: CITEREFPiazzaVan_Doren2022 (help) ^ Fichera, Angelo; Spencer, Saranac Hale (October 20, 2020). "Trump's Long History With Conspiracy Theories". FactCheck.org . Retrieved September 15, 2021. ^ Subramaniam, Tara; Lybrand, Holmes (October 15, 2020). "Fact-checking the dangerous bin Laden conspiracy theory that Trump touted". CNN . Retrieved October 11, 2021. ^ Haberman, Maggie (February 29, 2016). "Even as He Rises, Donald Trump Entertains Conspiracy Theories". The New York Times . Retrieved October 11, 2021. ^ Bump, Philip (November 26, 2019). "President Trump loves conspiracy theories. Has he ever been right?". The Washington Post . Retrieved October 11, 2021. ^ Reston, Maeve (July 2, 2020). "The Conspiracy-Theorist-in-Chief clears the way for fringe candidates to become mainstream". CNN . Retrieved October 11, 2021. ^ a b Finnegan, Michael (September 25, 2016). "Scope of Trump's falsehoods unprecedented for a modern presidential candidate". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved October 10, 2021. ^ Cite error: The named reference whoppers was invoked but never defined (see the help page). ^ Glasser, Susan B. (August 3, 2018). "It's True: Trump Is Lying More, and He's Doing It on Purpose". The New Yorker . Retrieved January 10, 2019. ^ Konnikova, Maria (January 20, 2017). "Trump's Lies vs. Your Brain". Politico Magazine . Retrieved March 31, 2018. ^ Conger, Kate; Isaac, Mike (January 16, 2021). "Inside Twitter's Decision to Cut Off Trump". The New York Times . Retrieved October 10, 2021. ^ Landers, Elizabeth (June 6, 2017). "White House: Trump's tweets are 'official statements'". CNN . Retrieved October 10, 2021. ^ Dwoskin, Elizabeth (May 27, 2020). "Twitter labels Trump's tweets with a fact check for the first time". The Washington Post . Retrieved July 7, 2020. ^ Dwoskin, Elizabeth (May 27, 2020). "Trump lashes out at social media companies after Twitter labels tweets with fact checks". The Washington Post . Retrieved May 28, 2020. ^ Fischer, Sara; Gold, Ashley (January 11, 2021). "All the platforms that have banned or restricted Trump so far". Axios . Retrieved January 16, 2021. ^ Timberg, Craig (January 14, 2021). "Twitter ban reveals that tech companies held keys to Trump's power all along". The Washington Post . Retrieved February 17, 2021. ^ Alba, Davey; Koeze, Ella; Silver, Jacob (June 7, 2021). "What Happened When Trump Was Banned on Social Media". The New York Times . Retrieved December 21, 2023. ^ Dwoskin, Elizabeth; Timberg, Craig (January 16, 2021). "Misinformation dropped dramatically the week after Twitter banned Trump and some allies". The Washington Post . Retrieved February 17, 2021. ^ Parnes, Amie (April 28, 2018). "Trump's love-hate relationship with the press". The Hill . Retrieved July 4, 2018. ^ Cillizza, Chris (June 14, 2016). "This Harvard study is a powerful indictment of the media's role in Donald Trump's rise". The Washington Post . Retrieved October 1, 2021. ^ Grynbaum, Michael M. (December 30, 2019). "After Another Year of Trump Attacks, 'Ominous Signs' for the American Press". The New York Times . Retrieved October 11, 2021. ^ "US judge throws out Donald Trump's lawsuit against New York Times". The Guardian . May 3, 2023. Retrieved November 25, 2024. ^ Geltzer, Joshua A.; Katyal, Neal K. (March 11, 2020). "The True Danger of the Trump Campaign's Defamation Lawsuits". The Atlantic . Retrieved October 1, 2020. ^ Kapur, Sahil (October 13, 2024). "'Totally illegal': Trump escalates rhetoric on outlawing political dissent and criticism". NBC News . Retrieved November 23, 2024. ^ Folkenflik, David (October 21, 2024). "Could Trump's threats against news outlets carry weight if he wins the presidency?". NPR News . Retrieved November 23, 2024. ^ Barnes, Brooks (December 18, 2024). "Inside Disney's Decision to Settle a Trump Defamation Suit". The New York Times . Retrieved January 12, 2025. ^ "ABC News to pay 15ドル million in Trump defamation suit settlement". The Washington Post . 14 December 2024. ^ "ABC settles Trump's defamation suit for 15ドルM". The Hill . 14 December 2024.

Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).