User talk:Raviwrites1969

Hello, Raviwrites1969, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created, such as Draft:Absent Findings, may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse , where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – for contributing to other articles. Writing a new article is tough, so getting experience elsewhere is useful.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me }} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

The page Draft:Absent Findings has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibited one or more of the following signs which indicated that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

• Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
• Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
• Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. 331dot (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Absent Findings, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• The page exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. (See the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator , or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Rich ^T|C|E-Mail 17:29, 28 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello Raviwrites1969. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Raviwrites1969. The template {{Paid }} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Raviwrites1969|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 29 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I do not have any financial stake in the article. I started following the brand and the journey of the brand after attending the Dubai Fashion Week and watching the impressive debut by the brand. I started researching the brand and thought of Wikipedia and that is how I landed on Wikipedia - and learning to write encyclopedically on the platform. After the last set of comments, I have made further changes to the article. This is my first attempt at writing on this platform, and I hope to contribute more and more in the future as an independent contributor. I hope that my draft with further changes will get accepted and published. It will give me a lot of confidence for the future. Raviwrites1969 (talk) 16:47, 29 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

So you were in Dubai strolling down the street and, at random, decided to enter the Dubai Fashion Week, and out of all the companies present there, decided to edit about this one? 331dot (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I was not strolling down the street, I was invited to day three of the show and I went and watched the show and saw many other brands also. I hope that I have satisfied your specific query. Raviwrites1969 (talk) 17:00, 29 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

You do say on other platforms that "Paid collab and Promotion available" Hence the concern. Theroadislong (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I didn't get an invitation. Why did you get one? 331dot (talk) 17:49, 29 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I got an invite because a very close friend of mine works for a prominent showroom and wholesaler in the UAE. He was invited because of the position he commends in the local market; he had a few complimentary invites, and he gave me one invite to attend the day three of Dubai Fashion Week with him. I do not write on any other platform. Wikipedia was my first attempt because of the encyclopaedical and fact-based approach, and I hope that I am successful in my first attempt and I get encouraged to contribute more and more to this platform. I hope that I have answered all your concerns. Raviwrites1969 (talk) 18:05, 29 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

The page Draft:Absent Findings has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator . 331dot (talk) 00:56, 31 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

I am unconvinced that you are not a paid editor, but even if you're not, you're too close to this topic to edit about it, and you seem to be here for no other purpose. 331dot (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2026 (UTC) [reply ]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
• Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for advertising