User talk:Produce1029
Hello, Produce1029, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Henry Hudson did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy , and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse , where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! meamemg (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2024 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of north–south roads in Toronto, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Barrie, Ontario until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Richmond Hill, Ontario, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello, Produce1029. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Niagara-On-The-Lake Nationals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply
Hello, Produce1029. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Niagara-On-The-Lake Nationals".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC) Reply
Hello, Produce1029. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Niagara-on-the-Lake Nationals".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
Thanks for your contributions to The Well, Toronto. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC) Reply
The article Birchmount Park-Warden Woods, Toronto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
None of the current sources mention this area. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage, and by that I mean zero, from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 12:45, 4 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, P740, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:P740 where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Misopatam (talk | contribs) 16:27, 4 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birchmount Park-Warden Woods, Toronto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Information icon Hello, Produce1029. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Well, Toronto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 26 May 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hello, Produce1029. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Well".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scarborough Board of Education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agincourt. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 7 September 2025 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello, Produce1029. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:P740, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hello, Produce1029. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "P740".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:26, 4 November 2025 (UTC) Reply
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM }} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC) Reply
Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sherbrooke. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2026 (UTC) Reply
Information icon Hello! Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Eurocopter AS350 Écureuil! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web }} template to cite a web page:
Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022年04月02日}}</ref> dolor sit amet.
which displays inline in the running text of the article as:
and displays under References as:
- ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022年04月02日.
If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations: try the Citer tool, or in the wikitext editor, try the reFill tool, and in the Visual Editor, the reference dialog can convert some bare urls into a full citation. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. Danners430 tweaks made 06:44, 13 August 2026 (UTC) Reply