User talk:Powdering
May 2026
[edit ]Information icon Hello, I'm ArchCardinal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Auteur have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ArchCardinal talk • contribs 20:34, 18 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Information icon Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Arbovirus. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ArchCardinal talk • contribs 20:50, 18 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
icon Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hantavirus infection, you may be blocked from editing. Pyrrhic victor (talk) 20:59, 18 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ABC transporter. ArchCardinal talk • contribs 14:06, 21 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Hello, I'm a little bit confused on what I "vandalized" on ABC transporter. Thanks. Powdering (talk) 18:44, 21 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- The edit was considered vandalism because it introduced several obvious errors and formatting changes that did not appear constructive, and taken with your editing history I could not assume good faith. In particular:
- The word "high" was changed to "hig" in multiple places.
- "[...] human) result" was changed to "[...] humas) resultst".
- "metals" was changed to "metal,s".
- Bold formatting was added to seemingly random words in the lead.
- Taken together, these changes appeared disruptive rather than constructive. This same pattern has appeared in other edits including Arbovirus and Extraversion and introversion, which is why the warning was issued.
- If these edits were accidental or made in good faith, please take more care when editing and use the preview function before saving. You may also find the Wikipedia Adventure and the Manual of Style helpful for learning how to contribute constructively. ArchCardinal talk • contribs 13:14, 22 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oh, I just checked the history, and that is strange. I thought all I did was add a few commas or so, but I don't remember doing anything about those. Anyways whatever. Powdering (talk) 04:08, 24 May 2026 (UTC) [reply ]
- The edit was considered vandalism because it introduced several obvious errors and formatting changes that did not appear constructive, and taken with your editing history I could not assume good faith. In particular: