User talk:PiOrbital
PiOrbital, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit ]
Hi PiOrbital! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk).
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts
16:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ayo Kimathi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can Ayo_Kimathi&preloadparams%5b%5d=1175250582"}]]}">report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC) Reply
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict , a topic designated as contentious . This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware }} template.
[画像:Information icon] You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
Your editing at Huffington Post does not follow WP:NPOV and continuing to edit like that may lead to you being sanctioned. Galobtter (talk) 02:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC) Reply
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lisa Hajjar. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (t · c) buidhe 20:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Reply
- This was legitimately referenced. PiOrbital (talk) 22:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Reply
- The reference you used was not WP:RS EvergreenFir (talk) 23:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Reply
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at HuffPost, you may be blocked from editing. Do not add unsourced commentary. —C45207 | Talk 08:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Reply
Discretionary sanction
[edit ]
The following topic ban now applies to you:
American politics from 1992 to present, broadly construed, for 5 mos.
You have been sanctioned repeated tendentious and WP:POINTY edits in this topic.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC) Reply
Please do not delete sourced material from their article: they are fascist and the article should be labeled as such. — Czello (music) 00:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- What do you mean by fascist? Please refer to recognized definitions with citations and references within Wikipedia if you think such a subjective label is defensible. PiOrbital (talk) 00:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Citations call them fascist. — Czello (music) 00:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- These citations are to individuals in non-scholarly publications. Moreover, it is self-evident that such strong labels are subjective and only with a substantial amount of scholarly and serious effort that is published can such claims be made. PiOrbital (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- If you want to question the reliability of the sources the proper venue is WP:RSN. — Czello (music) 00:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- I wrote many early pages on Wikipedia in hard subjects. I can see that things have changes and now this noble project has been hijacked. PiOrbital (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- The Nation, Al Jazeera and CNN are not legitimate sources. PiOrbital (talk) 00:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- I hope you appreciate how nice Czello is being here. I am surprised not to see warning templates for content removal, edit warring or just for vandalism. Please stop now. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Oh, and for misuse of the minor edits tag. I do hope that wasn't deliberate. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Yes they are, per WP:RSP. — Czello (music) 11:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- If you want to question the reliability of the sources the proper venue is WP:RSN. — Czello (music) 00:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- These citations are to individuals in non-scholarly publications. Moreover, it is self-evident that such strong labels are subjective and only with a substantial amount of scholarly and serious effort that is published can such claims be made. PiOrbital (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Citations call them fascist. — Czello (music) 00:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Britain First, you may be blocked from editing. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Very clear and adequate explanations were made. PiOrbital (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Britain First. Binksternet (talk) 02:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- You are violating NPOV. PiOrbital (talk) 02:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Read the comments and view the evidence. You are violating Wikipedia's NPOV policy. PiOrbital (talk) 02:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC) Reply
You have already received a notice about editing related to the Arab-Israeli dispute. If you would like to suggest changes to the Palestine Action page, please make the request on the article's talk page. Burrobert (talk) 06:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Reply
- I've reverted PiOrbital's edits on this article. @PiOrbital: please see the article talk page. You must be extended-confirmed to edit the article. — Czello (music) 08:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Reply
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM }} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC) Reply
You have already received a notice about editing related to the Arab-Israeli dispute. If you would like to suggest changes to Nicholas Kristof's page related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, please make the request on the article's talk page. Burrobert (talk) 06:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Reply
- Please do not edit in the area of the Arab-Israeli conflict, as you have done repeatedly on Nicholas Kristof's page, until you satisfy the requirements of the notice above. Burrobert (talk) 06:56, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Reply